General of the Armies

General of the Armies of the United States, more commonly referred to as General of the Armies, is the highest military rank in the United States. The rank has been conferred three times: to John J. Pershing in 1919, as a personal accolade for his command of the American Expeditionary Forces during World War I; to George Washington in 1976, as a posthumous honor during the United States Bicentennial celebrations; and posthumously to victorious Civil War commander Ulysses S. Grant in 2024.

The grade is sometimes described as a six-star general, as being senior to the five-star grade of General of the Army. However, no six-star insignia was ever officially created, and Pershing, the only person to be General of the Armies during his own lifetime, never wore more than four stars.<ref name=Oliver_1983>Template:Cite book</ref> Whether Pershing's grade should rank as four, five, or six stars has been a subject of debate ever since the five-star grades were created in 1944.<ref name=HJRes519/> To make Washington unambiguously the highest ranking Army officer in 1976, Congress specified that his new grade of General of the Armies ranked above all other grades of the Army, past or present,<ref name=PL_94-479/> while the law authorizing Grant's promotion made his rank in parity with Pershing's rank.

The General of the Armies enjoyed several privileges not afforded to other generals, including a much higher salary and the right to retire at full pay and allowances. Even in retirement, Pershing—the only-ever living person with the rank—was the second-highest-paid official in the federal government, after only the president of the United States.<ref name=Post-Gazette_1931-03-23/>

History

Origin

Attempt to appoint Washington

File:GeorgeWashingtonByRobertField.jpg

The office of General of the Armies was created for George Washington in 1799, but he was not actually appointed until 1976.

The office of "General of the Armies of the United States" was created by an Act of Congress on March 3, 1799, which stated:

Template:ErrorTemplate:Main other{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

The law was intended to elevate George Washington, who was then a lieutenant general commanding the provisional army being organized to fight the Quasi-War against France, but President John Adams never made the appointment, concerned it would infringe on the president's constitutional function as "commander-in-chief of the armed forces".<ref name=Attorney_General_1856>Template:Cite book</ref> Washington died on December 14, 1799, and the grade lapsed on March 16, 1802, when not mentioned in the law that defined the peacetime military establishment.<ref name="faq_5_stars">.{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

American Civil War

After the American Civil War, Congress honored Ulysses S. Grant for his successful command of the Union Army by authorizing his promotion to the grade of general under the Act of July 25, 1866, which stated:

Template:ErrorTemplate:Main other{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Despite being titled "General of the Army" instead of "General of the Armies", the Comptroller General of the United States would rule in 1924 that the grade revived in 1866 for Grant (and later William T. Sherman and Philip H. Sheridan) was the same grade that had been created for Washington in 1799 and revived for Pershing in 1919.<ref name=Trask_1996>Template:Cite book</ref>

Template:ErrorTemplate:Main other{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Pershing would inherit several of his unique perquisites as General of the Armies through this legislative continuity with the Grant, Sherman, and Sheridan grade, including a much higher salary than other generals and the right to retire at full pay instead of three-quarters pay.<ref name=4_Comp_Gen_317/>

John J. Pershing (1919)

File:John Pershing.jpg

John J. Pershing was General of the Armies from September 3, 1919, until his death on July 15, 1948.

During World War I, Congress authorized the ex officio grade of general for the chief of staff of the Army and the commander of the American Expeditionary Forces (AEF) in France, but only during the wartime emergency.<ref name=Act_1917-10-06>Act of October 6, 1917 (Template:USStat).</ref> Unlike the 1866 grade, which was a permanent personal appointment, the 1917 grade was only held while occupying a specific office. Army chief of staff Tasker H. Bliss and AEF commander John J. Pershing were commissioned emergency generals on October 8, 1917, with Peyton C. March succeeding Bliss as chief of staff and emergency general on May 20, 1918.<ref name=NYT_1917-10-09>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name=NYT_1918-05-21>Template:Cite news</ref>

Attempt to appoint March with Pershing

When the war ended, Pershing and March were due to lose their emergency grades and revert to major general, so on June 18, 1919, President Woodrow Wilson asked Congress to promote both men to permanent general in a way that gave Pershing precedence over March.<ref name=NYT_1919-07-19>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name=Wilson_1919>Template:Cite book</ref> Six weeks later, the House Military Affairs Committee reported out two bills authorizing Pershing and March to each be appointed General of the Armies.<ref name=HR_7594>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name=HR_7595>Template:Cite book</ref> To ensure that Pershing would outrank March, Pershing's bill also repealed the 1917 law that gave the Army chief of staff precedence over all other Army officers.<ref name=Washington_Post_1919-09-07>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name=Act_1917-05-12>Act of May 12, 1917 (Template:USStat).</ref>

Congress and Pershing both opposed March's promotion, having clashed with him during the war, so March's bill did not pass and he reverted to major general. He was later advanced to general on the retired list.<ref name=Smythe_1981>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Pershing appointment

File:Pershing 1919 commission.png

President Woodrow Wilson accidentally gave Pershing a commission to be a general instead of a General of the Armies.

On September 3, 1919, President Wilson signed Public Law 66-45, providing:

Template:ErrorTemplate:Main other{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

The bill had been rushed through Congress in only two days so that Secretary of War Newton D. Baker could hand Pershing his new commission as soon as he arrived from France on September 8, when his emergency grade would expire.<ref name=NYT_1919-09-04>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name=NYT_1919-09-09>Template:Cite news</ref>

In the haste to promote Pershing, Wilson accidentally nominated him to be a general in the Army instead of a General of the Armies, a difference that could have cost Pershing half his income when he retired.<ref name=ANJ_1919-09-20>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name=NYT_1924-08-19>Template:Cite news</ref>

Official Army publications subsequently took care to spell out Pershing's title as General of the Armies, as distinct from the emergency generals of 1917 and the rank of general that was held by the chief of staff of the Army after 1929.<ref name=NYT_1921-07-10>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name=NYT_1929-02-24>Template:Cite news</ref> In 1928, Secretary of War Dwight F. Davis even increased the 17-gun salute authorized for a General of the Armies to the 19 guns of a European field marshal.<ref name=Boston_Globe_1928-12-14>Template:Cite news</ref>

Continued privileges during retirement

File:State, War, & Navy Building - Washington, D.C..jpg

The General of the Armies had a spacious office in the old State, War, and Navy Building until 1947.

Pershing transferred to the retired list on September 12, 1924, but continued to draw full pay and allowances, a privilege not granted to other generals.<ref name=4_Comp_Gen_317/>

Even after retiring, the General of the Armies maintained a spacious office in the old State, War, and Navy Building until it was relocated to the Pentagon in 1947, years after ill health had permanently confined Pershing to Walter Reed General Hospital.<ref name=Greensburg_Daily_News_1947-11-22>Template:Cite news</ref> In 1939, Congress created the office of military secretary to the General of the Armies with the rank of colonel so Pershing's longtime aide, Captain George E. Adamson, could continue to manage Pershing's affairs after his own retirement.<ref name=S_1301>Template:Cite book</ref>

World War II

There were several attempts to appoint senior World War II officers as Generals of the Armies, but none came to fruition.

Attempts to appoint Marshall and Arnold

File:George Marshall 1947.jpg

Army chief of staff and Pershing protégé George C. Marshall resisted further appointments to General of the Armies while Pershing was still alive.

In August 1943, Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Ernest J. King increased his efforts to create a grade higher than four stars after being outranked by his British counterpart at the First Quebec Conference. The Navy could even be outranked by the Army if Pershing died and Army chief of staff George C. Marshall inherited his title of General of the Armies with its de facto five-star rank, as retired CNO William V. Pratt warned King in January 1944.<ref name=Buell_1980>Buell (1980), pp. 362–365.</ref>

Marshall opposed any higher grade, saying he did not need one. King and Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson both suspected that as Pershing's longtime protégé, Marshall would resist any rank equivalent to General of the Armies while his mentor was still alive.<ref name=Buell_1980/><ref name=Pogue_1973_p365>Pogue (1973), pp. 365–367.</ref> Stimson did ask President Franklin D. Roosevelt to appoint Marshall as General of the Armies in September 1943 so he could command the planned invasion of France while remaining chief of staff, but Roosevelt ultimately gave the command to Dwight D. Eisenhower instead.<ref name=Pogue_1973_p267>Pogue (1973), pp. 267 Template:Webarchive, 273.</ref>

In February 1944, King's lobbying led both houses of Congress to submit bills reviving the grades of General of the Armies and Admiral of the Navy. King wanted the American Joint Chiefs of Staff to rank with the British field marshals on the Combined Chiefs of Staff, raising both Marshall and Army Air Forces commander Henry H. Arnold to five-star General of the Armies.<ref name=Buell_1980/><ref name=Battle_Creek_Enquirer_1944-02-05>Template:Cite news</ref> However, House Naval Affairs Committee chairman Carl Vinson wanted King and Marshall to have even higher rank, so the House bills inserted a five-star fleet admiral below a six-star Admiral of the Navy, which the Army was expected to match with its own five-star grade and a six-star General of the Armies. Even King thought six stars was too much, and public opposition convinced supporters of higher grades to defer legislation until after a successful landing in Europe.<ref name=Buell_1980/><ref name=Pogue_1973_p365/>

Creation of five-star grade

File:Henry Stimson, Harris & Ewing bw photo portrait, 1929.jpg

Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson insisted that the Army's five-star grade not be called General of the Armies.

With the invasion of Europe well underway by September 1944, the War Department finally gave its blessing to a five-star grade on condition that it not be called General of the Armies, a title reserved for the higher rank held by Pershing.<ref name=Daily_News_1944-09-15>Template:Cite news</ref> In a press conference on September 14, 1944, Stimson said:

Template:ErrorTemplate:Main other{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

On December 14, 1944, Public Law 78-482 established the five-star grade of General of the Army, preserving Pershing's status as the only General of the Armies and further stating that nothing would change about the 1919 law that had promoted him:

Template:ErrorTemplate:Main other{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Six-star debate

Template:See also By specifying that nothing about the General of the Armies would be changed by the law that created the five-star grades, Congress intended Pershing to remain the highest-ranking officer in the Army.<ref name=Mercury_1944>Template:Cite news</ref> This sparked a long-running debate over whether Pershing was now a six-star general; the senior five-star general; or even just a four-star general, as later argued by an influential pair of articles by Frederick Bernays Wiener, who pointed out that the 1919 law that revived his office did not actually say that the General of the Armies outranked all other Army officers, but merely repealed a 1917 law that would have let the Army chief of staff outrank him.<ref name=Army_1978/><ref name=Wiener_1970-12>Wiener (December 1970), p. 32. "The final clause was aimed at so much of the Act of 12 May 1917 (40 Stat. 46) as had provided that the chief of staff 'shall take rank and precedence over all other officers of the Army.'"</ref><ref name=Smythe_1986>Template:Cite book</ref>

For the rest of Pershing's life, official publications consistently treated the General of the Armies as being one grade higher than a five-star general.<ref name=Military_Laws_1949>Template:Cite book</ref><ref name=Wiener_1971-01_AR_600-15>Wiener (January 1971), p. 44. "Paragraph 3 of AR 600-15, from 21 January 1945 until 14 August 1951, listed the three "highest grades of rank" as follows: "a. General of the Armies of the United States; b. General of the Army; c. General.""</ref> As late as 1951, Army regulations specified 19 guns to salute the General of the Armies, and only 17 guns for a General of the Army.<ref name=Greeley_Daily_Tribune_1951-04-17>Template:Cite news</ref>

Pershing himself never wore more than four stars.<ref name=Oliver_1983/> Army regulations let the General of the Armies design his own uniform, but by the time the five-star grade was created in 1944, Pershing was too infirm to consider updating his insignia.<ref name=Palladium-Item_1945-04-11>Template:Cite news</ref> When Pershing died on July 15, 1948, a proposal to bury him in a uniform bearing six stars was rejected in favor of the four stars he had always worn.<ref name=Mossman_1991>Template:Cite book</ref>

Attempts to appoint MacArthur

File:Douglas MacArthur promotion order to General of the Armies.jpg

There were multiple unsuccessful attempts to promote Douglas MacArthur to General of the Armies after the Korean War.

In January 1955, Congressional supporters of General of the Army Douglas MacArthur introduced legislation to appoint him General of the Armies, backdated to his 75th birthday on January 26.<ref name=SJRes26>Senate Joint Resolution 26 (January 21, 1955).</ref> The proposal stalled in the House Armed Services Committee after the Defense Department opposed it on the grounds that promoting only MacArthur would downgrade all other five-star officers and "arouse interservice, intraservice and popular misunderstanding and controversies."<ref name=Herald-Post_1955-05-10>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name=Long_Beach_Independent_1955-05-11>Template:Cite news</ref> Another attempt was still pending in Congress when MacArthur died on April 5, 1964.<ref name=Military_Review_1966>Template:Cite journal</ref> Further efforts were made to grant a posthumous promotion to MacArthur following his death.<ref>Template:Cite book</ref>

George Washington (1976)

In September 1953, the New York Times reported that because George Washington had never been appointed General of the Armies in 1799, he remained a lieutenant general who was now outranked by 45 other generals, living and dead.<ref name=NYT_1953-09-28>Template:Cite news</ref> Citing this low rank, Senator Edward Martin introduced a bill in April 1954 to appoint Washington posthumously as General of the Armies.<ref name=CR_1954-04-28>Template:Cite book</ref>

Twenty-two years later, a veterans group in the district of Representative Mario Biaggi observed that Washington had still not been promoted, prompting Biaggi to sponsor a joint resolution to elevate Washington to General of the Armies as part of the United States Bicentennial celebration in 1976.<ref name=NYT_1976-10-13>Template:Cite news</ref>

When the House Armed Services Committee met to consider the resolution, a committee counsel acknowledged that it was still debatable whether Pershing was ever more than a four-star general, but Representative F. Edward Hébert asserted that the language of this resolution did make Washington a six-star general, saying, "We have three grades—general, General of the Army, and this is General of the Armies of the United States."<ref name=HJRes519>Template:Cite book</ref>

Representative Lucien N. Nedzi objected that Washington's stature was already so high that giving him a modern Army rank just made Congress look ridiculous. "It's like having the Pope offer to make Christ a cardinal."<ref name=Palm_Beach_Post_1976-08-26>Template:Cite news</ref>

Washington appointment

File:Orders 31-3.jpg

Secretary of the Army Clifford L. Alexander Jr. signed the order to promote George Washington to General of the Armies on March 13, 1978, 179 years after the grade was originally created for him.

Deeming it "fitting and proper that no officer of the United States Army should outrank Lieutenant General George Washington on the Army list," Public Law 94-479 declared that:

Template:ErrorTemplate:Main other{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}

Although President Gerald Ford signed the law on October 11, 1976, no further action was taken to promote Washington until February 1978, when a military driver studying for a promotion board asked his passenger, General Donn A. Starry, whether Washington now outranked Pershing. The specialist five's question to a four-star general triggered a chain of inquiries that caused the Department of the Army to issue Orders 31-3 on March 13, 1978, posthumously promoting Washington to the grade of General of the Armies of the United States, effective from the 200th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1976.<ref name=Army_1978>Template:Cite magazine</ref> When the question was asked again in 1992, the U.S. Army Institute of Heraldry considered Pershing's rank to be equivalent to five stars and junior to Washington.<ref name=IoH_1992>Template:Cite journal</ref>

Ulysses S. Grant (2024)

File:Ulysses S Grant by William F Cogswell, 1868.jpg

Ulysses S. Grant was posthumously promoted to the rank of General of the Armies in 2024.

In September 2021, joint resolutions authorizing the President to appoint Ulysses S. Grant posthumously to the grade of General of the Armies of the United States were introduced in the House and Senate by a bipartisan Congressional delegation from his home states of Ohio, Missouri, and New York. In a letter to the secretary of defense, three of the bill's sponsors argued that by reestablishing the General of the Armies grade with "precedence over all other grades of the Army, past or present," the 1976 law authorizing Washington's promotion had effectively lowered the grade to which Grant was appointed in 1866.<ref name=NYT_2022>Template:Cite news</ref><ref name=letter_2022>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref>

Supporters of Grant's promotion hoped the law would pass in time for his 200th birthday on April 27, 2022, the date of rank specified in the bill, which was titled the "Ulysses S. Grant Bicentennial Recognition Act". The joint resolutions were referred to the House Armed Services Committee and Senate Judiciary Committee, neither of which took any action.<ref name=NYT_2022/><ref name=Grant_joint_resolutions>H.J. 58 Template:Webarchive and S. J. 26 Template:Webarchive, 117th Congress.</ref> Instead, the annual defense policy bill used different language to authorize Grant's appointment to the grade of General of the Armies, adding a clause that tied his rank and precedence to that of Pershing.<ref>{{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=web }}</ref><ref name=":0">Template:Cite tweet</ref>

Grant authorization

Section 583 of the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, signed into law on December 23, 2022, states:

Template:ErrorTemplate:Main other{{#if:|{{#if:|}}

— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries

}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}In compliance with the law signed by President Joe Biden, the secretary of defense, Lloyd Austin approved and issued a memorandum to the secretary of the Army to posthumously advance Grant to General of the Armies on April 19, 2024.<ref name=":0" />

Insignia

File:US-O10 insignia.svg

Pershing never wore more than four stars as General of the Armies.

File:Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg

Instead of the regulation bronze "U.S." collar insignia, Pershing wore a gold eagle representing the Great Seal of the United States.

No insignia was ever officially specified for the General of the Armies, who was allowed to define it for himself.<ref name=faq_5_stars/>

Upon being appointed General of the Armies in 1919, Pershing continued to wear the four silver stars and gold collar eagle that he had selected for his insignia as a general in 1917, when Army regulations authorized generals to prescribe their own shoulder and collar insignia. Pershing and Generals Tasker H. Bliss and Peyton C. March all chose to wear four silver stars on their shoulders, instead of the previous insignia of two silver stars and a gold eagle. Pershing and Bliss also replaced the regulation bronze "U.S." insignia on their collars with a gold eagle representing the Great Seal of the United States.<ref name=faq_5_stars/><ref name=Wiener_1945-11_p51>Wiener (November 1945), pp. 51–52. "Pershing, Bliss, and March all went back to the earlier insignia of four stars. Pershing and Bliss both wore the arms of the U. S. in gold on their collars....AR 600-35, October 14, 1921, prescribed one, two, three, and four stars for the several grades of general officers, but continued the provision permitting the General of the Armies and generals to wear such collar insignia as they might prescribe...."</ref><ref name=Daily_News_1944-12-17>Template:Cite news</ref>

In 1937, Pershing created a custom full dress uniform to attend the coronation of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth, denoting his rank with four gold stars embroidered on each sleeve.<ref name=Gettysburg_Times_1937-04-28/> Full dress uniforms for other general officers used silver stars, including the custom uniform that Army chief of staff Malin Craig designed for himself the following year.<ref name=Meixsel_2005/>

Because the General of the Armies prescribed his own insignia, later tradition held that Pershing could have worn as many stars as he wanted. Claimed one expert in 1976, "if a General of the Armies wants to wear six stars, he can. Or seven. Or 10, I guess."<ref name=Tennessean_1976-08-04>Template:Cite news</ref> The creation of the five-star grades in 1944 led to suggestions that Pershing clarify his seniority by adopting a six-star insignia, but by then he was too ill.<ref name=Palladium-Item_1945-04-11/><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> When Pershing died in 1948, funeral planners considered affixing a six-star insignia to his uniform, but instead buried him with the four stars he wore in life.<ref name=Mossman_1991/>

Special privileges

Compensation

As General of the Armies, Pershing was paid much more than other generals. The 1919 law that promoted Pershing gave the General of the Armies the same annual pay of Template:US$ that was set in 1870 for General William T. Sherman, plus Template:US$ in allowances.<ref name=Post-Gazette_1931-03-23>Template:Cite news</ref>

All other generals fell under the Joint Service Pay Readjustment Act of 1922, which set the pay for a major general at Template:US$. Higher ranks had the same pay as a major general plus a personal money allowance of Template:US$ for a lieutenant general, Template:US$ for a general, or Template:US$ for a general of the Army.<ref name=Wiener_1945-11>Wiener (November 1945), p. 55. "The present situation is additionally unfortunate in that the retired pay for a Lieutenant General or a General (or for a General of the Army under the 1944 Act) is just exactly the same, penny for penny, as the retired pay of a Major General. This is a consequence of the fact that the pay for all of these grades is the same, while the personal money allowance lapses on retirement."</ref> Including food and housing, the annual compensation for a general of the Army in December 1944 was Template:US$, versus Template:US$ for the General of the Armies (respectively equivalent to $Template:Inflation and $Template:Inflation in Template:Inflation/year).<ref name=Wiener_1971-01_p47>Wiener (January 1971), p. 47. "A general of the Army at the pay scale of December 1944 received only $8,000 pay, plus (assuming dependents) a quarters allowance of $1,440 and a subsistence allowance of $511, and, in addition, a personal money allowance of $5,000."</ref>

Retirement

The General of the Armies retired with full pay and allowances, another benefit created for Sherman and inherited by Pershing, who continued to receive $21,500 for the rest of his life.<ref name=Wiener_1945-11/> Even in retirement, he drew a higher annual compensation than any other official in the federal government except the president of the United States.<ref name=Post-Gazette_1931-03-23/>

Other generals retired at three-quarters pay and no allowances. When Army chief of staff Charles P. Summerall retired in 1931, his annual compensation fell to only $6,000, three-quarters of a major general's pay.<ref name=Wiener_1945-11/>

Uniform

Starting in 1933, the General of the Armies was allowed to design his own uniform, as were current and former Army chiefs of staff.<ref name=Meixsel_2005>Template:Cite journal</ref> Pershing used this authority to create the unique uniform he wore to the 1937 coronation of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth, styled after the full dress uniform introduced by the Army in 1902 but discontinued in 1917. Whereas the 1902 uniform portrayed the rank of a general officer by embroidering silver stars on each sleeve, Pershing's 1937 uniform sleeves bore four gold stars.<ref name=Gettysburg_Times_1937-04-28>Template:Cite news</ref> When Army chief of staff Malin Craig designed his own custom uniform in 1938, he returned to the usual silver stars.<ref name=Meixsel_2005/>

Pershing's estate donated his General of the Armies uniforms to the Smithsonian Institution,<ref name=Arizona_Republic_1948-07-22>Template:Cite news</ref> including the 1921 service coat with four silver stars that he wore as Army chief of staff and the 1937 full dress coat with four gold stars that he wore to the coronation.

Equivalence with Admiral of the Navy

File:Théobald Chartran - Admiral George Dewey - NPG.86.144 - National Portrait Gallery.jpg

Admiral of the Navy George Dewey held a unique grade often treated as the U.S. Navy equivalent of General of the Armies.

On March 2, 1899, Congress created the grade of Admiral of the Navy to honor George Dewey for his victory at the Battle of Manila Bay. Only Dewey ever held this grade, which is often treated as the United States Navy equivalent of General of the Armies, although the two grades never overlapped since Dewey died on January 16, 1917, two years before Pershing's appointment.<ref name=Gazette_1919-08-21>Template:Cite news</ref>

Admiral of the Navy and General of the Armies were permanent grades awarded as personal accolades for past service, unlike the later ex officio ranks of admiral and general. Both grades carried the same annual pay of $13,500 for life, and the proposal to create more Admirals of the Navy in 1944 continued to tie their compensation to the General of the Armies.<ref name=House_Naval_Affairs_1944>Template:Cite book</ref>

After Dewey was mistakenly nominated to be an admiral in the Navy instead of Admiral of the Navy in 1899 and had to be renominated in 1903, the Navy carefully distinguished between Dewey's grade and the rank of admiral that was held by the three fleet commanders from 1915, and the Chief of Naval Operations from 1916.<ref name=NYT_1903-03-15>Template:Cite news</ref><ref>Template:Cite book</ref> The Army took similar care to distinguish between Pershing's grade and the rank of general held by the chief of staff of the Army from 1929, after Pershing was mistakenly nominated to be a general in the Army instead of General of the Armies in 1919.<ref name=NYT_1921-07-10/><ref name=NYT_1929-02-24/>

Because Dewey and Pershing were both treated as if they held grades higher than admiral or general, before World War II they were sometimes thought to be on par with a British admiral of the fleet or field marshal.<ref name=Gazette_1919-08-21/> When the five-star grades were created in 1944, the initial legislation called them Admiral of the Navy and General of the Armies. However, House Naval Affairs Committee chairman Carl Vinson inserted a five-star fleet admiral below Admiral of the Navy, which he wanted to be a six-star grade.<ref name=Pogue_1973_p365/> Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson then required that the five-star Army grade not be called General of the Armies, which he thought was also a higher rank.<ref name=Daily_News_1944-09-15/>

Although the 1944 proposal to create six-star grades was dropped, Army and Navy regulations in 1951 still authorized only 17 guns to salute a five-star officer, and 19 guns for an Admiral of the Navy or General of the Armies.<ref name=Greeley_Daily_Tribune_1951-04-17/><ref name=All_Hands_1955>Template:Cite magazine</ref>

See also

• General officers in the United States
• Six-star rank
• United States Army officer rank insignia

References

• Template:Cite book

• Template:Cite book

• Template:Cite journal

• Template:Cite journal

• Template:Cite journal

Pay grade / branch of service	Officer candidate	Template:Nowrap	Template:Nowrap	Template:Nowrap	Template:Nowrap	Template:Nowrap	Template:Nowrap	Template:Nowrap	Template:Nowrap	Template:Nowrap	Template:Nowrap	Wartime grade	Special grade
Insignia	[1]	File:US-O1 insignia.svg	File:US-O2 insignia.svg	File:US-O3 insignia.svg	File:US-O4 insignia.svg	File:US-O5 insignia.svg	File:US-O6 insignia.svg	File:US-O7 insignia.svg	File:US-O8 insignia.svg	File:US-O9 insignia.svg	File:US-O10 insignia.svg	File:US-O11 insignia.svg	[2]
Template:Flagicon image Army	CDT / OC	2LT	1LT	CPT	MAJ	LTC	COL	BG	MG	LTG	GEN	GA[3]	GAS[2]
Template:Flagicon image Marine Corps	Midn / Cand	2ndLt	1stLt	Capt	Maj	LtCol	Col	BGen	MajGen	LtGen	Gen	[5]	[5]
Template:Flagicon image Navy	MIDN / OC	ENS	LTJG	LT	LCDR	CDR	CAPT	RDML	RADM	VADM	ADM	FADM[3]	[5]
Template:Flagicon image Air Force	Cdt / OT	2d Lt	1st Lt	Capt	Maj	Lt Col	Col	Template:Nowrap	Template:Nowrap	Lt Gen	Gen	GAF[3]	[5]
Template:Flagicon image Space Force	Cdt / OT	2d Lt	1st Lt	Capt	Maj	Lt Col	Col	Template:Nowrap	Template:Nowrap	Lt Gen	Gen	[5]	[5]
Template:Flagicon image Coast Guard	CDT / OC	ENS	LTJG	LT	LCDR	CDR	CAPT	RDML	RADM	VADM	ADM	[5]	[5]
Template:Flagicon image PHS Corps	OC	ENS	LTJG	LT	LCDR	CDR	CAPT	RDML	RADM	VADM	ADM	[5]	[5]
Template:Flagicon image NOAA Corps	OC	ENS	LTJG	LT	LCDR	CDR	CAPT	RDML	RADM	VADM	[4]	[5]	[5]
[1] No universal insignia for officer candidate rank [2] No official insignia and not currently listed by the Army as an obtainable rank. John J. Pershing's GAS insignia: File:Greater coat of arms of the United States.svg (collar) File:US-O10 insignia.svg (epaulettes) [3] These ranks are reserved for wartime use only, and are still listed as ranks within their respective services [4] Grade is authorized by the U.S. Code for use but has not been created [5] Grade has never been created or authorized