Marc Bloch

Template:Short description Template:Good article Template:Use dmy dates Template:EngvarB Template:Infobox person Marc Léopold Benjamin Bloch (Template:IPAc-en Template:Respell; {{#invoke:IPA|main}}; 6 July 1886 – 16 June 1944) was a French historian. He was a founding member of the Annales School of French social history. Bloch specialised in medieval history and published widely on medieval France over the course of his career. As an academic, he worked at the University of Strasbourg (1920 to 1936 and 1940 to 1941), the University of Paris (1936 to 1939), and the University of Montpellier (1941 to 1944).

Born in Lyon to an Alsatian Jewish family, Bloch was raised in Paris, where his father—the classical historian Gustave Bloch—worked at Sorbonne University. Bloch was educated at various Parisian lycées and the {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, and from an early age was affected by the antisemitism of the Dreyfus affair. During the First World War, he served in the French Army and fought at the First Battle of the Marne and the Somme. After the war, he was awarded his doctorate in 1918 and became a lecturer at the University of Strasbourg. There, he formed an intellectual partnership with modern historian Lucien Febvre. Together they founded the Annales School and began publishing the journal Annales d'histoire économique et sociale in 1929. Bloch was a modernist in his historiographical approach, and repeatedly emphasised the importance of a multidisciplinary engagement towards history, particularly blending his research with that on geography, sociology and economics, which was his subject when he was offered a post at the University of Paris in 1936.

During the Second World War Bloch volunteered for service, and was a logistician during the Phoney War. Involved in the Battle of Dunkirk and spending a brief time in Britain, he unsuccessfully attempted to secure passage to the United States. Back in France, where his ability to work was curtailed by new antisemitic regulations, he applied for and received one of the few permits available allowing Jews to continue working in the French university system. He had to leave Paris, and complained that the Nazi German authorities looted his apartment and stole his books; he was also persuaded by Febvre to relinquish his position on the editorial board of Annales. Bloch worked in Montpellier until November 1942 when Germany invaded Vichy France. He then joined the non-Communist section of the French Resistance and went on to play a leading role in its unified regional structures in Lyon. In 1944, he was captured by the Gestapo in Lyon and murdered in a summary execution after the Allied invasion of Normandy. Several works—including influential studies like The Historian's Craft and Strange Defeat—were published posthumously.

His historical studies and his death as a member of the Resistance together made Bloch highly regarded by generations of post-war French historians; he came to be called "the greatest historian of all time".Template:Sfn By the end of the 20th century, historians were making a more critical assessment of Bloch's abilities, influence, and legacy, arguing that there were flaws to his approach.

Youth and upbringingEdit

FamilyEdit

Marc Bloch was born in Lyon on 6 July 1886,Template:Sfn one of two childrenTemplate:Sfn to Gustave Template:Refn and Sarah Bloch,Template:Sfn née Ebstein.Template:Sfn Bloch's family were Alsatian Jews: secular, liberal and loyal to the French Republic.Template:Sfn They "struck a balance", says the historian Carole Fink, between both "fierce Jacobin patriotism and the antinationalism of the left".Template:Sfn His family had lived in Alsace for five generations under French rule. In 1871, France was forced to cede the region to Germany following its defeat in the Franco-Prussian War.Template:Sfn Template:Refn The year after Bloch's birth, his father was appointed professor of Roman History at the Sorbonne, and the family moved to ParisTemplate:Sfn—"the glittering capital of the Third Republic".Template:Sfn Marc had a brother, Louis Constant Alexandre,Template:Sfn seven years his senior. The two were close, although Bloch later described Louis as being occasionally somewhat intimidating.Template:Sfn The Bloch family lived at 72, Rue d'Alésia, in the 14th arrondissement of Paris. Gustave began teaching Marc history while he was still a boy,Template:Sfn with a secular, rather than Jewish, education intended to prepare him for a career in professional French society.Template:Sfn Bloch's later close collaborator, Lucien Febvre, visited the Bloch family at home in 1902;Template:Sfn although the reason for Febvre's visit is now unknown, he later wrote of Bloch that "from this fleeting meeting, I have kept the memory of a slender adolescent with eyes brilliant with intelligence and timid cheeks—a little lost then in the radiance of his older brother, future doctor of great prestige".Template:Sfn

Upbringing and educationEdit

Bloch's biographer Katherine Stirling ascribed significance to the era in which Bloch was born: the middle of the French Third Republic, so "after those who had founded it and before the generation that would aggressively challenge it".Template:Sfn Template:Refn When Bloch was nine-years-old, the Dreyfus affair broke out in France. As the first major display of political antisemitism in Europe, it was probably a formative event of Bloch's youth,Template:Sfn Template:Refn along with, more generally, the atmosphere of fin de siècle Paris.Template:Sfn Bloch was 11 when Émile Zola published J'Accuse…!, his indictment of the French establishment's antisemitism and corruption.Template:Sfn Bloch was greatly affected by the Dreyfus affair, but even more affected was nineteenth-century France generally, and his father's employer, the École Normale Supérieure, saw existing divides in French society reinforced in every debate.Template:Sfn Gustave Bloch was closely involved in the Dreyfusard movement and his son agreed with the cause.Template:Sfn

Bloch was educated at the prestigious Lycée Louis-le-Grand for three years, where he was consistently head of his class and won prizes in French, history, Latin, and natural history.Template:Sfn He passed his baccalauréat, in Letters and Philosophy, in July 1903, being graded trés bien (very good).Template:Sfn The following year,Template:Sfn he received a scholarshipTemplate:Sfn and undertook postgraduate study there for the École normale supérieure (ÉNS)Template:Sfn (where his father had been appointed maître de conferences in 1887).Template:Sfn His father had been nicknamed le Méga by his students at the ÉNS and the moniker Microméga was bestowed upon Bloch.Template:Sfn Template:Refn Here he was taught history by Christian Pfister Template:Sfn and Charles Seignobos, who led a relatively new school of historical thought which saw history as broad themes punctuated by tumultuous events.Template:Sfn Another important influence on Bloch from this period was his father's contemporary, the sociologist Émile Durkheim, who pre-figured Bloch's own later emphasis on cross-disciplinary research.Template:Sfn The same year, Bloch visited England; he later recalled being struck more by the number of homeless people on the Victoria Embankment than the new Entente Cordiale relationship between the two countries.Template:Sfn

The Dreyfus affair had soured Bloch's views of the French Army, and he considered it laden with "snobbery, anti-semitism and anti-republicanism".Template:Sfn National service had been made compulsory for all French adult males in 1905, with an enlistment term of two years.Template:Sfn Bloch joined the 46th Infantry Regiment based at Pithiviers from 1905 to 1906.Template:Sfn

Early researchEdit

File:Engagement decennal Marc Bloch.jpg

Bloch's official engagement papers for the l'École Normale Supérieure in 1908 for a 10-year period

By this time, changes were taking place in French academia. In Bloch's own speciality of history, attempts were being made at instilling a more scientific methodology. In other, newer departments such a sociology, efforts were made at establishing an independent identity.Template:Sfn Bloch graduated in 1908 with degrees in both geography and history (Davies notes, given Bloch's later divergent interests, the significance of the two qualifications).Template:Sfn He had a high respect for historical geography, then a speciality of French historiography,Template:Sfn as practised by his tutor Vidal de la Blache whose Tableau de la géographie Bloch had studied at the ÉNS,Template:Sfn and Lucien Gallois.Template:Sfn Bloch applied unsuccessfully for a fellowship at the Fondation Thiers.Template:Sfn As a result,Template:Sfn he travelled to Germany in 1909Template:Sfn where he studied demography under Karl Bücher in Leipzig and religion Template:Sfn under Adolf Harnack in Berlin;Template:Sfn he did not, however, particularly socialise with fellow students while in Germany.Template:Sfn He returned to France the following year and again applied to the Fondation, this time successfully.Template:Sfn Bloch researched the medieval Île-de-France Template:Sfn in preparation for his thesis.Template:Sfn This research was Bloch's first focus on rural history.Template:Sfn His parents had moved house and now resided at the Avenue d'Orleans, not far from Bloch's quarters.Template:Sfn Template:Refn

Bloch's research at the FondationTemplate:Refn—especially his research into the Capetian kings—laid the groundwork for his career.Template:Sfn He began by creating maps of the Paris area illustrating where serfdom had thrived and where it had not. He also investigated the nature of serfdom, the culture of which, he discovered, was founded almost completely on custom and practice.Template:Sfn His studies of this period formed Bloch into a mature scholar and first brought him into contact with other disciplines whose relevance he was to emphasise for most of his career. Serfdom as a topic was so broad that he touched on commerce, currency, popular religion, the nobility, as well as art, architecture, and literature.Template:Sfn His doctoral thesis—a study of 10th-century French serfdom—was titled Rois et Serfs, un Chapitre d'Histoire Capétienne. Although it helped mould Bloch's ideas for the future, it did not, says Bryce Loyn, give any indication of the originality of thought that Bloch would later be known for,Template:Sfn and was not vastly different to what others had written on the subject.Template:Sfn Following his graduation, he taught at two lycées,Template:Sfn first in Montpelier, a minor university town of 66,000 inhabitants.Template:Sfn With Bloch working over 16 hours a week on his classes, there was little time for him to work on his thesis.Template:Sfn He also taught at the University of Amiens.Template:Sfn While there, he wrote a review of Febvre's first book, Histoire de Franche-Comté.Template:Sfn Bloch intended to turn his thesis into a book, but the First World War intervened.Template:Sfn Template:Refn

First World WarEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}Both Marc and Louis Bloch volunteered for service in the French Army.Template:Sfn Although the Dreyfus Affair had soured Bloch's views of the French Army, he later wrote that his criticisms were only of the officers; he "had respect only for the men".Template:Sfn Bloch was one of over 800 ÉNS students who enlisted; 239 were to be killed in action.Template:Sfn On 2 August 1914Template:Sfn he was assigned to the 272nd Reserve Regiment.Template:Sfn Within eight days he was stationed on the Belgian border where he fought in the Battle of the Meuse later that month. His regiment took part in the general retreat on the 25th, and the following day they were in Barricourt, in the Argonne. The march westward continued towards the river Marne—with a temporary recuperative halt in Termes—which they reached in early September. During the First Battle of the Marne, Bloch's troop was responsible for the assault and capture of Florent before advancing on La Gruerie.Template:Sfn Bloch led his troop with shouts of "Forward the 18th!" They suffered heavy casualties: 89 men were either missing or known to be dead.Template:Sfn Bloch enjoyed the early days of the war;Template:Sfn like most of his generation, he had expected a short but glorious conflict.Template:Sfn Gustave Bloch remained in France, wishing to be close to his sons at the front.Template:Sfn

File:Marc Bloch, made a knight of the Legion of Honour.jpg

The Department of War's official bestowing of the Chevalier de Légion d'honneur on Marc Bloch, 8 November 1920

Except for two months in hospital followed by another three recuperating, he spent the war in the infantry;Template:Sfn he joined as a sergeant and rose to become the head of his section.Template:Sfn Bloch kept a war diary from his enlistment. Very detailed in the first few months, it rapidly became more general in its observations. However, says the historian Daniel Hochedez, Bloch was aware of his role as both a "witness and narrator" to events and wanted as detailed a basis for his historiographical understanding as possible.Template:Sfn The historian Rees Davies notes that although Bloch served in the war with "considerable distinction",Template:Sfn it had come at the worst possible time both for his intellectual development and his study of medieval society.Template:Sfn

For the first time in his life, Bloch later wrote, he worked and lived alongside people he had never had close contact with before, such as shop workers and labourers,Template:Sfn with whom he developed a great camaraderie.Template:Sfn It was a completely different world to the one he was used to, being "a world where differences were settled not by words but by bullets".Template:Sfn His experiences made him rethink his views on history,Template:Sfn and influenced his subsequent approach to the world in general.Template:Sfn He was particularly moved by the collective psychology he witnessed in the trenches.Template:Sfn He later declared he knew of no better men than "the men of the Nord and the Pas de Calais"Template:Sfn with whom he had spent four years in close quarters.Template:Sfn Template:Refn His few references to the French generals were sparse and sardonic.Template:Sfn

Apart from the Marne, Bloch fought at the battles of the Somme, the Argonne, and the final German assault on Paris. He survived the war,Template:Sfn which he later described as having been an "honour" to have served through.Template:Sfn He had, however, lost many friends and colleagues.Template:Sfn Among the closest of them, all killed in action, were: Maxime David (died 1914), Antoine-Jules Bianconi (died 1915) and Ernest Babut (died 1916).Template:Sfn Bloch himself was wounded twiceTemplate:Sfn and decorated for courage,Template:Sfn receiving the Croix de Guerre Template:Sfn and the Légion d'Honneur.Template:Sfn He had joined as a non-commissioned officer, received an officer's commission after the Marne,Template:Sfn and had been promoted to warrant officer Template:Sfn and finally a captain in the fuel service, (Service des essences) before the war ended.Template:Sfn He was clearly, says Loyn, both a good and a brave soldier;Template:Sfn he later wrote, "I know only one way to persuade a troop to brave danger: brave it yourself".Template:Sfn

While on front-line service, Bloch contracted severe arthritis which required him to retire regularly to the thermal baths of Aix-les-Bains for treatment.Template:Sfn He later remembered very little of the historical events he found himself in, writing only that his memories wereTemplate:Sfn Template:Sfn "a discontinuous series of images, vivid in themselves, but badly arranged, like a reel of motion picture film containing some large gaps and some reversals of certain scenes".Template:Sfn Bloch later described the war, in a detached style, as having been a "gigantic social experience, of unbelievable richness".Template:Sfn For example, he had a habit of noting the different coloured smoke that different shells made — percussion bombs had black smoke, timed bombs were brown.Template:Sfn He also remembered both the "friends killed at our side ... of the intoxication which had taken hold of us when we saw the enemy in flight".Template:Sfn He also considered it to have been "four years of fighting idleness".Template:Sfn Following the Armistice in November 1918, Bloch was demobilised on 13 March 1919.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn

CareerEdit

Early careerEdit

Template:Quote boxThe war was fundamental in re-arranging Bloch's approach to history, although he never acknowledged it as a turning point.Template:Sfn In the years following the war, a disillusioned Bloch rejected the ideas and the traditions that had formed his scholarly training. He rejected the political and biographical history which up until that point was the norm,Template:Sfn along with what the historian George Huppert has described as a "laborious cult of facts" that accompanied it.Template:Sfn In 1920, with the opening of the University of Strasbourg,Template:Sfn Bloch was appointed chargé de coursTemplate:Sfn (assistant lecturer)Template:Sfn of medieval history.Template:Sfn Alsace-Lorraine had been returned to France with the Treaty of Versailles; the status of the region was a contentious political issue in Strasbourg, its capital, which had a large German population.Template:Sfn Bloch, however, refused to take either side in the debate; indeed, he appears to have avoided politics entirely.Template:Sfn Under Wilhelmine Germany, Strasbourg had rivalled Berlin as a centre for intellectual advancement, and the University of Strasbourg possessed the largest academic library in the world. Thus, says Stephan R. Epstein of the London School of Economics, "Bloch's unrivalled knowledge of the European Middle Ages was ... built on and around the French University of Strasbourg's inherited German treasures".Template:Sfn Template:Refn Bloch also taught French to the few German students who were still at the Centre d'Études Germaniques at the University of Mainz during the Occupation of the Rhineland.Template:Sfn He refrained from taking a public position when France occupied the Ruhr in 1923 over Germany's perceived failure to pay war reparations.Template:Sfn

Bloch began working energetically,Template:Sfn and later said that the most productive years of his life were spent at Strasbourg.Template:Sfn In his teaching, his delivery was halting. His approach sometimes appeared cold and distant—caustic enough to be upsettingTemplate:Sfn—but conversely, he could be also both charismatic and forceful.Template:Sfn Durkheim died in 1917, but the movement he began against the "smugness" that pervaded French intellectual thinking continued.Template:Sfn Bloch had been greatly influenced by him, as Durkheim also considered the connections between historians and sociologists to be greater than their differences. Not only did he openly acknowledge Durkheim's influence, but Bloch "repeatedly seized any opportunity to reiterate" it, according to R. C. Rhodes.Template:Sfn

At Strasbourg, he again met Febvre, who was now a leading historianTemplate:Sfn of the 16th century.Template:Sfn Modern and medieval seminars were adjacent to each other at Strasbourg, and attendance often overlapped.Template:Sfn Their meeting has been called a "germinal event for 20th-century historiography",Template:Sfn and they were to work closely together for the rest of Bloch's life. Febvre was some years older than Bloch and was probably a great influence on him.Template:Sfn They lived in the same area of StrasbourgTemplate:Sfn and became kindred spirits,Template:Sfn often going on walking trips across the Vosges and other excursions.Template:Sfn

Bloch's fundamental views on the nature and purpose of the study of history were established by 1920.Template:Sfn That same year he defended,Template:Sfn and subsequently published, his thesis.Template:Sfn It was not as extensive a work as had been intended due to the war.Template:Sfn There was a provision in French further education for doctoral candidates for whom the war had interrupted their research to submit only a small portion of the full-length thesis usually required.Template:Sfn It sufficed, however, to demonstrate his credentials as a medievalist in the eyes of his contemporaries.Template:Sfn He began publishing articles in Henri Berr's Revue de Synthèse Historique.Template:Sfn Bloch also published his first major work, Les Rois thaumaturges, which he later described as "ce gros enfant" (this big child).Template:Sfn In 1928, Bloch was invited to lecture at the Institute for the Comparative Study of Civilizations in Oslo. Here he first expounded publicly his theories on total, comparative history:Template:Sfn Template:Refn "it was a compelling plea for breaking out of national barriers that circumscribed historical research, for jumping out of geographical frameworks, for escaping from a world of artificiality, for making both horizontal and vertical comparisons of societies, and for enlisting the assistance of other disciplines".Template:Sfn

Comparative history and the AnnalesEdit

File:Lucien Febvre-Strasbourg.jpg

Bloch's friend and colleague for most of his life, Lucien Febvre, at an unknown date

His 1928 Oslo lecture, called "Towards a Comparative History of Europe",Template:Sfn formed the basis of his next book, Les Caractères Originaux de l'Histoire Rurale Française.Template:Sfn In the same yearTemplate:Sfn he founded the historical journal Annales with Febvre.Template:Sfn One of its aims was to counteract the administrative school of history, which Davies says had "committed the arch error of emptying history of human element". As Bloch saw it, it was his duty to correct that tendency.Template:Sfn Both Bloch and Febvre were keen to refocus French historical scholarship on social rather than political history and to promote the use of sociological techniques.Template:Sfn The journal avoided narrative history almost completely.Template:Sfn

The inaugural issue of the Annales stated the editors' basic aims: to counteract the arbitrary and artificial division of history into periods, to re-unite history and social science as a single body of thought, and to promote the acceptance of all other schools of thought into historiography. As a result, the Annales often contained commentary on contemporary, rather than exclusively historical, events.Template:Sfn Editing the journal led to Bloch forming close professional relationships with scholars in different fields across Europe.Template:Sfn The Annales was the only academic journal to boast a preconceived methodological perspective. Neither Bloch nor Febvre wanted to present a neutral facade. During the decade it was published it maintained a staunchly left-wing position.Template:Sfn Henri Pirenne, a Belgian historian who wrote comparative history, closely supported the new journal.Template:Sfn Before the war he had acted in an unofficial capacity as a conduit between French and German schools of historiography.Template:Sfn Fernand Braudel—who was himself to become an important member of the Annales School after the Second World War—later described the journal's management as being a chief executive officer—Bloch—with a minister of foreign affairs—Febvre.Template:Sfn

Utilizing comparative methodology allowed Bloch to discover instances of uniqueness within aspects of society,Template:Sfn and he advocated it as a new kind of history.Template:Sfn According to Bryce Lyon, Braudel and Febvre, "promising to perform all the burdensome tasks" themselves, asked Pirenne to become editor-in-chief of Annales to no avail. Pirenne remained a strong supporter, however, and had an article published in the first volume in 1929.Template:Sfn He became close friends with both Bloch and Febvre. He was particularly influential on Bloch, who later said that Pirenne's approach should be the model for historians and that "at the time his country was fighting beside mine for justice and civilisation, wrote in captivity a history of Europe".Template:Sfn The three men kept up a regular correspondence until Pirenne's death in 1935.Template:Sfn In 1923, Bloch attended the inaugural meeting of the International Congress on Historical Studies (ICHS) in Brussels, which was opened by Pirenne. Bloch was a prolific reviewer for Annales, and during the 1920s and 1930s he contributed over 700 reviews. These included criticisms of specific works, but more generally, represented his own fluid thinking during this period. The reviews demonstrate the extent to which he shifted his thinking on particular subjects.Template:Sfn

Move to ParisEdit

In 1930, both keen to make a move to Paris, Febvre and Bloch applied to the École pratique des hautes études for a position: both failed.Template:Sfn Three years later Febvre was elected to the Collège de France. He moved to Paris, and in doing so, says Fink, became all the more aloof.Template:Sfn This placed a strain on Bloch's and his relations,Template:Sfn although they communicated regularly by letter and much of their correspondence is preserved.Template:Sfn In 1934, Bloch was invited to speak at the London School of Economics. There he met Eileen Power, R. H. Tawney and Michael Postan, among others. While in London, he was asked to write a section of the Cambridge Economic History of Europe; at the same time, he also attempted to foster interest in the Annales among British historians.Template:Sfn Template:Refn He later told Febvre in some ways he felt he had a closer affinity with academic life in England than that of France.Template:Sfn For example, in comparing the Bibliothèque Nationale with the British Museum, he said thatTemplate:Sfn

A few hours work in the British [Museum] inspire the irresistible desire to build in the Square Louvois a vast pyre of all the B.N.'s regulations and to burn on it, in splendid auto-de-fé, Julian Cain [the director], his librarians and his staff...[and] also a few malodorous readers, if you like, and no doubt also the architect ... after which we could work and invite the foreigners to come and work".Template:Sfn{{#if:|{{#if:|}}
— {{#if:|, in }}Template:Comma separated entries
}}

{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=Template:Main other|preview=Page using Template:Blockquote with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | author | by | char | character | cite | class | content | multiline | personquoted | publication | quote | quotesource | quotetext | sign | source | style | text | title | ts }}Template:Quote boxDuring this period he supported the Popular Front politically.Template:Sfn Although he did not believe it would do any good, he signed Alain's—Émile Chartier's pseudonym—petition against Paul Boncour's Militarisation laws in 1935.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn While he was opposed to the rise of European fascism, he also objected to attempting to counter the ideology through "demagogic appeals to the masses", as the Communist Party was doing.Template:Sfn Febvre and Bloch were both firmly on the left, although with different emphases. Febvre, for example, was more militantly Marxist than Bloch, while the latter criticised both the pacifist left and corporate trade unionism.Template:Sfn

In 1934, Étienne Gilson sponsored Bloch's candidacy for a chair at the Collège de France.Template:Sfn The college, says the historian Eugen Weber, was Bloch's "dream" appointment—although one never to be realised—as it was one of the few (possibly the only) institutions in France where personal research was central to lecturing.Template:Sfn Camille Jullian had died the previous year, and his position was now available. While he had lived, Julian had wished for his chair to go to one of his students, Albert Grenier, and after his death, his colleagues generally agreed with him.Template:Sfn However, Gilson proposed that not only should Bloch be appointed, but that the position be redesignated the study of comparative history. Bloch, says Weber, enjoyed and welcomed new schools of thought and ideas, but mistakenly believed the college should do so also; the college did not. The contest between Bloch and Grenier was not just the struggle for one post between two historians; it was also a struggle to determine which path historiography within the college would take for the next generation.Template:Sfn To complicate the situation further, the country was in both political and economic crises, and the college's budget was slashed by 10%. No matter who filled it, this made another new chair financially unviable. By the end of the year, and with further retirements, the college had lost four professors: it could replace only one, and Bloch was not appointed.Template:Sfn Bloch personally suspected his failure was due to antisemitism and Jewish quotas. At the time, Febvre blamed it on a distrust of Bloch's approach to scholarship by the academic establishment, although Epstein has argued that this could not have been an over-riding fear as Bloch's next appointment indicated.Template:Sfn

Joins the SorbonneEdit

Template:Quote box Henri Hauser retired from the Sorbonne in 1936, and his chair in economic history Template:Sfn was up for appointment.Template:Sfn Bloch—"distancing himself from the encroaching threat of Nazi Germany"Template:Sfn—applied and was approved for his position.Template:Sfn This was a more demanding position than the one he had applied for at the college.Template:Sfn Weber has suggested Bloch was appointed because unlike at the college, he had not come into conflict with many faculty members.Template:Sfn Weber researched the archives of the college in 1991 and discovered that Bloch had indicated an interest in working there as early as 1928, even though that would have meant him being appointed to the chair in numismatics rather than history. In a letter to the recruitment board written the same year, Bloch indicated that although he was not officially applying, he felt that "this kind of work (which he claimed to be alone in doing) deserves to have its place one day in our great foundation of free scientific research".Template:Sfn H. Stuart Hughes says of Bloch's Sorbonne appointment: "In another country, it might have occasioned surprise that a medievalist like Bloch should have been named to such a chair with so little previous preparation. In France it was only to be expected: no one else was better qualified".Template:Sfn His first lecture was on the theme of never-ending history, a process, a never-to-be-finished thing.Template:Sfn Davies says his years at the Sorbonne were to be "the most fruitful" of Bloch's career,Template:Sfn and according to Epstein he was by now the most significant French historian of his age.Template:Sfn In 1936, Friedman says he considered using Marx in his teachings, with the intention of bringing "some fresh air" into the Sorbonne.Template:Sfn

The same year, Bloch and his family visited Venice, where they were chaperoned by the Italian historian Gino Luzzatto.Template:Sfn Template:Refn During this period they were living in the Sèvres – Babylone area of Paris, next to the Hôtel Lutetia.Template:Sfn

By now, Annales was being published six times a year to keep on top of current affairs, however, its "outlook was gloomy".Template:Sfn In 1938, the publishers withdrew support and, experiencing financial hardship, the journal moved to cheaper offices, raised its prices, and returned to publishing quarterly.Template:Sfn Febvre increasingly opposed the direction Bloch wanted to take the journal. Febvre wanted it to be a "journal of ideas",Template:Sfn whereas Bloch saw it as a vehicle for the exchange of information to different areas of scholarship.Template:Sfn

By early 1939, war was known to be imminent. Bloch, in spite of his age, which automatically exempted him,Template:Sfn had a reserve commission for the armyTemplate:Sfn holding the rank of captain.Template:Sfn He had already been mobilised twice in false alarms.Template:Sfn In August 1939, he and his wife Simonne intended to travel to the ICHS in Bucharest.Template:Sfn In autumn 1939,Template:Sfn just before the outbreak of war, Bloch published the first volume of Feudal Society.Template:Sfn

Second World WarEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}} Template:Quote boxOn 24 August 1939, at the age of 53,Template:Sfn Bloch was mobilised for a third time.Template:Sfn He was responsible for the mobilisation of the French Army's massive motorised units Template:Sfn which involved him undertaking such a detailed assessment of the French fuel supply that he later wrote he was able to "count petrol tins and ration every drop" of fuel he obtained.Template:Sfn During the first few months of the war, called the Phoney War,Template:Sfn Template:Refn he was stationed in Alsace,Template:Sfn this time lacking the eager patriotism he had shown in the war.Template:Sfn He also evacuated civilians to behind the Maginot Line Template:Sfn and for a while he worked with British Intelligence.Template:Sfn Template:Refn

Bloch began but did not complete writing a history of France.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn At one point he expected to be invited to neutral Belgium to deliver a series of lectures in Liège, on Belgian neutrality.Template:Sfn Some academics had escaped France for The New School in New York City, and the School also invited Bloch. He refused,Template:Sfn possibly because of difficulties in obtaining visas:Template:Sfn the US government would not grant visas to every member of his family.Template:Sfn

Fall of FranceEdit

Template:See also

File:Strasbourg-Plaque Marc Bloch.jpg

Plaque commemorating Bloch in the Marc Bloch University, Strasbourg, now part of the refounded University of Strasbourg

In May 1940, the German army forced the French to withdraw.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Bloch fought at the Battle of Dunkirk in May–June 1940, being evacuated to England.Template:Sfn Although he could have remained in Britain,Template:Sfn he chose to return to FranceTemplate:Sfn because his family was still there.Template:Sfn

Template:Sfn To Bloch, France collapsed because her generals failed to capitalise on the best qualities humanity possessed—character and intelligenceTemplate:Sfn—because of their own "sluggish and intractable" progress since the First World War.Template:Sfn

Two-thirds of France were occupied by Germany.Template:Sfn Bloch was demobilised soon after Philippe Pétain's government signed the Armistice of 22 June 1940 forming Vichy France.Template:Sfn Bloch receivedTemplate:Sfn a permit to work despite being Jewish.Template:Sfn This was probably due to Bloch's pre-eminence in the field of history.Template:Sfn He worked again at the University of Strasbourg, now relocated to Clermont-Ferrand, for one academic year before moving to Montpellier.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn In Clermont-Ferrand, his two older sons were involved with the Christian-conservative Gaullist Template:Sfn Resistance organisation Combat.Template:Sfn In November 1940 he received an offer of employment from The New School in New York, but he delayed his decision due to his reluctance to leave family members behind; it expired in July 1941 before he could obtain visas for his adult children.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Montpellier, further south, was beneficial to his wife's declining health.Template:Sfn The dean of faculty at Montpellier was an antisemite,Template:Sfn who also disliked Bloch for having once given him a poor review.Template:Sfn Bloch rejected the Vichy propaganda notion of returning to traditional French values,Template:Sfn arguing that "the idyllic, docile peasant life of the French right had never existed".Template:Sfn In Montpellier, he had to be escorted to class for protection from militant right-wing students.Template:Sfn His university contacts included the local leaders of Combat and organisers of the Comité Général d'Etudes (an underground Conseil d'État Template:Sfn), René Courtin and Pierre-Henri Teitgen.Template:Sfn He also knew the sociologist and Communist Resistance member Georges Friedmann and the philosopher of mathematics Jean Cavaillès,Template:Sfn a key Resistance figure who co-founded the left-wing Libération-sud in Clermont-Ferrand in December 1940, was arrested in Narbonne in September 1942 and escaped from Montpellier prison in December 1942.

Declining relationship with FebvreEdit

Template:Quote boxBloch's professional relationship with Febvre was also under strain. The Nazis wanted French editorial boards to be stripped of Jews in accordance with German racial policies. Facing the potential seizure or liquidation of Annales, Febvre insisted on continuing to publish it in Paris to ensure an international distribution and demanded that Bloch step down for the sake of preserving their project. Bloch initially refused what he called "an abdication" and proposed to move the journal to the unoccupied zone.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn In his desire to keep the journal afloat at all costs, Febvre went so far as to point out that Bloch had himself tried to rescue his Paris library.Template:Sfn Bloch, forced to accede, turned the Annales over to the sole editorship of Febvre, who then changed the journal's name to Mélanges d'Histoire Sociale. Bloch was forced to write for it under the pseudonym Marc Fougères.Template:Sfn

The Annalist historian André Burguière suggests Febvre did not really understand the position Bloch, or any French Jew, was in.Template:Sfn Already damaged by this disagreement, Bloch's and Febvre's relationship declined further when the former had been forced to leave his library and papersTemplate:Sfn in his Paris apartment following his move to Vichy. On account of limited space in Montpellier, he had attempted to have them transported to his country home in Fougères.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Eventually the Nazis looted his apartment and removed the library in January 1942.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Bloch held Febvre responsible, believing he could have done more to prevent it.Template:Sfn Bloch had refused to donate the library to the University of Montpellier at the advice of the Vichy education minister, his friend Jérôme Carcopino, and later protested the loss to the newly appointed minister Abel Bonnard.Template:Sfn

Bloch's mother had recently died, and his wife was ill; he faced daily harassment.Template:Sfn On 18 March 1941, Bloch made his will in Clermont-Ferrand.Template:Sfn The Polish social historian Bronisław Geremek suggests that this document hints at Bloch in some way foreseeing his death,Template:Sfn as he emphasised that nobody had the right to avoid fighting for their country.Template:Sfn

French resistanceEdit

File:Cour de la prison Montluc.jpg

Exterior of Montluc Prison, where Bloch and his comrades were held before their deaths; the mural is modern.

In November 1942 Germany occupied the territory previously under direct Vichy rule.Template:Sfn This was the catalyst for Bloch's decision to join the moderate republican Franc-Tireur movement (FT) in the French Resistance, led by Template:Ill, which was being integrated by Jean Moulin into Mouvements unis de la Résistance (MUR), by March 1943.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Bloch had previously expressed the view that "there can be no salvation where there is not some sacrifice".Template:Sfn He sent his family away to Fougères (except for his daughter who worked in Limoges and for his two elder sons whom he helped cross the border to Francoist Spain Template:Sfn) and moved to Lyon to join the underground,Template:Sfn although he found this difficult because of his age.Template:Sfn Bloch used his professional and military skills for the movement, writing propaganda and organising supplies and materiel in the region.Template:Sfn He wrote for the underground FT magazines Franc-Tireur, La Revue libre and Template:Ill, and by 1944 oversaw the distribution of the first title.Template:Sfn He was a member of FT's steering committee and since July 1943 represented it in the regional directory of the MUR.Template:Sfn Often on the move, Bloch used archival research as his excuse for travelling.Template:Sfn The journalist-turned-resistance fighter Georges Altman later told how he knew Bloch as, although originally "a man, made for the creative silence of gentle study, with a cabinet full of books" was now "running from street to street, deciphering secret letters in some Lyonaisse Resistance garret".Template:Sfn For the first time, suggests Lyon, Bloch was forced to consider the role of the individual in history, rather than the collective; perhaps by then even realising he should have done so earlier.Template:Sfn Template:Refn

Arrest, interrogation and deathEdit

Bloch was arrested by the Gestapo on the Pont de la Boucle in Lyon, shortly after leaving his nearby address on the morning of 8 March 1944,Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn as part of a wave of arrests launched by the new chief of French police, Joseph Darnand.Template:Sfn At the time, he was the acting head of the regional directory of the MUR for Rhône-Alpes,Template:Sfn tasked with preparing the uprising and seizure of power to coincide with the Allied landing (Jour-J),Template:Sfn and used the aliases "Maurice Blanchard" and "Narbonne".Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn The regional directory was scheduled to meet on the afternoon of that day, but on 7 March a number of key people had been arrested, including the local Combat leader Robert Blanc ('Drac') and Bloch's nephew and adjutant Jean Bloch-Michel ('Lombard'), of which Bloch learned from meeting with 'Chardon', a Combat member who recently arrived from Haute-Savoie and an associate of his other nephew Henri.Template:Sfn His nephew Jean, who was released in late May, admitted having given Bloch's address away;Template:Sfn he never mentioned Bloch in his memoirs and was later held responsible for his arrest.Template:Sfn 'Chardon' was cleared of suspicion by Alban Vistel, the regional head of MUR whom Bloch was replacing due to sickness, in an investigation which found that two other members of the network ('Chatoux' of Combat and Madame Jacotot) were seen in a Gestapo car after their arrests.Template:Sfn On the morning of Bloch's arrest his route was betrayed to the Gestapo, who already had his description but failed to seize him at home, by a local bakery owner.Template:Sfn A radio transmitter and some Resistance papers were found in his apartment on 9 March, after a key part of the archives had been entrusted for safekeeping by 'Chardon' to Jacotot, who was herself arrested on that day.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Bloch's arrest was touted in the Nazi and collaborationist press (such as Aujourd'hui, Le Matin and Le Petit Parisien) as a major success in the breaking up of a "Communist-terrorist" group financed from London and Moscow, led by a "Jew who had taken the pseudonym of a French southern city".Template:Sfn Template:Sfn The minister of information and propaganda Philippe Henriot boasted afterwards of destroying "the capital of the Resistance" in Lyon,Template:Sfn and the German ambassador Otto Abetz telegraphed about Bloch's arrest to Berlin.Template:Sfn

Bloch was detained in Montluc prison.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn As a key Resistance figure, he was interrogated and tortured daily in the Lyon Gestapo headquarters at the School of Military Health in avenue Berthelot by Klaus Barbie's men, suffering beatings, pneumonia from ice-baths, broken ribs and wrists.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn It was later claimed that he gave away no information to his interrogators, and while incarcerated taught French history to other inmates.Template:Sfn His interrogation protocol, which he signed three days before his death, contained the names of Resistance leaders already captured or in Algiers with General de Gaulle.Template:Sfn

File:Monument des Roussilles - 2.JPG

Monument des Roussilles; Bloch is commemorated on the far-left panel.

In the meantime, the Allies had invaded Normandy on 6 June 1944Template:Sfn and Nazis wanted to evacuate Vichy and "liquidate their holdings".Template:Sfn This meant disposing of as many prisoners as they could.Template:Sfn Between May and June 1944 the Nazi occupying forces murdered around 700 prisoners.Template:Sfn Bloch was among the twenty-eight men shot in the back with submachine guns in groups of four by Sicherheitsdienst Template:Sfn in a meadow at Les Roussilles near Saint-Didier-de-Formans on the night of 16 June 1944.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Template:Sfn The bodies were discovered on the next day and examined by French forensic authorities from Lyon.Template:Sfn For some time Bloch's death was merely a "dark rumour".Template:Sfn His wife Simonne, who suffered from undiagnosed stomach cancer, died on 2 July 1944.Template:Sfn Template:Sfn Eventually his personal effects were identified in September 1944 by his daughter Alice and sister-in-law Hélène Weill, who notified Febvre, and his death was officially announced on 1 November.Template:Sfn Weill also reported that Bloch's country residence in Fougères, deserted by his family in May 1944, had since been occupied and looted, allegedly by Communist partisans.Template:Sfn

The autobiographical speech read at Bloch's burial acknowledged his Jewish ancestry while affirming a French identity.Template:Sfn Template:Refn According to his instructions, on his grave was to be carved his epitaph {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} ("I have loved the truth").Template:Sfn

Historical method and approachEdit

Template:Quote boxDavies says Bloch was "no mean disputant"Template:Sfn in historiographical debate, often reducing an opponent's argument to its most basic weaknesses.Template:Sfn His approach was a reaction against the prevailing ideas within French historiography of the day which, when he was young, were still very much based on that of the German School, pioneered by Leopold von Ranke.Template:Refn Within French historiography this led to a forensic focus on administrative history as expounded by historians such as Ernest Lavisse.Template:Sfn While he acknowledged his and his generation of historians' debt to their predecessors, he considered that they treated historical research as being little more meaningful than detective work. Bloch later wrote how, in his view, "There is no waste more criminal than that of erudition running ... in neutral gear, nor any pride more vainly misplaced than that in a tool valued as an end in itself".Template:Sfn Template:Sfn He believed it was wrong for historians to focus on the evidence rather than the human condition of whatever period they were discussing.Template:Sfn Administrative historians, he said, understood every element of a government department without understanding anything of those who worked in it.Template:Sfn

Bloch was very much influenced by Ferdinand Lot, who had already written comparative history,Template:Sfn and by the work of Jules Michelet and Fustel de Coulanges with their emphasis on social history, Durkheim's sociological methodology, François Simiand's social economics, and Henri Bergson's philosophy of collectivism.Template:Sfn Bloch's emphasis on using comparative history harked back to the Enlightenment, when writers such as Voltaire and Montesquieu decried the notion that history was a linear narrative of individuals and pushed for greater use of philosophy in studying the past.Template:Sfn Bloch condemned the "German-dominated" school of political economy, which he considered "analytically unsophisticated and riddled with distortions".Template:Sfn Equally condemned were then-fashionable ideas on racial theories of national identity.Template:Sfn Bloch believed that political history on its own could not explain deeper socioeconomics trends and influences.Template:Sfn

Bloch did not see social history as being a separate field within historical research. Rather, he saw all aspects of history to be inherently a part of social history. By definition, all history was social history,Template:Sfn an approach he and Febvre termed "histoire totale",Template:Sfn not a focus on points of fact such as dates of battles, reigns, and changes of leaders and ministries, and a general confinement by the historian to what he can identify and verify.Template:Sfn Bloch explained in a letter to Pirenne that, in Bloch's eyes, the historian's most important quality was the ability to be surprised by what he found—"I am more and more convinced of this", he said; "damn those of us who believe everything is normal!"Template:Sfn Template:Quote boxBloch identified two types of historical eras: the generational era and the era of civilisation: these were defined by the speed with which they underwent change and development. In the latter type of period, which changed gradually, Bloch included physical, structural, and psychological aspects of society, while the generational era could experience fundamental change over a relatively few generations.Template:Sfn Bloch founded what modern French historians call the "regressive method" of historical scholarship. This method avoids the necessity of relying solely on historical documents as a source, by looking at the issues visible in later historical periods and drawing from them what they may have looked like centuries earlier. Davies says this was particularly useful in Bloch's study of village communities as "the strength of communal traditions often preserves earlier customs in a more or less fossilized state".Template:Sfn Bloch studied peasant tools in museums, observed their use in work, and discussed the objects with the people who used them.Template:Sfn He believed that in observing a plough or an annual harvest one was observing history, as more often than not both the technology and the technique were much the same as they had been hundreds of years earlier.Template:Sfn However, the individuals themselves were not his focus; instead, he focused on "the collectivity, the community, the society".Template:Sfn He wrote about the peasantry, rather than the individual peasant; says Lyon, "he roamed the provinces to become familiar with French agriculture over the long term, with the contours of peasant villages, with agrarian routine, its sounds and smells.Template:Sfn Bloch claimed that both fighting alongside the peasantry in the war and his historical research into their history had shown him "the vigorous and unwearied quickness"Template:Sfn of their minds.Template:Sfn

Bloch described his area of study as the comparative history of European society and explained why he did not identify himself as a medievalist: "I refuse to do so. I have no interest in changing labels, nor in clever labels themselves, or those that are thought to be so."Template:Sfn He did not leave a full study of his methodology, although it can be effectively reconstructed piecemeal.Template:Sfn He believed that history was the "science of movement",Template:Sfn but did not accept, for example, the aphorism that one could protect against the future by studying the past.Template:Sfn His work did not use a revolutionary approach to historiography; rather, he wished to combine the schools of thinking that preceded him into a new broad approach to historyTemplate:Sfn and, as he wrote in 1926, to bring to history "ce murmure qui n'était pas de la mort", ("the whisper that was not death').Template:Sfn He criticised what he called the "idol of the origins",Template:Sfn where historians concentrate overly hard on the formation of something to the detriment of studying the thing itself.Template:Sfn

Bloch's comparative history led him to tie his researches in with those of many other schools: social sciences, linguistics, philology, comparative literature, folklore, geography, and agronomy.Template:Sfn Similarly, he did not restrict himself to French history. At various points in his writings, Bloch commented on medieval Corsican, Finnish, Japanese, Norwegian and Welsh history.Template:Sfn R. R. Davies has compared Bloch's intelligence with what he calls that of "the Maitland of the 1890s", regarding his breadth of reading, use of language and multidisciplinary approach.Template:Sfn Unlike Maitland, however, Bloch also wished to synthesise scientific history with narrative history. According to Stirling, he managed to achieve "an imperfect and volatile imbalance" between them.Template:Sfn Bloch did not believe that it was possible to understand or recreate the past by the mere act of compiling facts from sources; rather, he described a source as a witness, "and like most witnesses", he wrote, "it rarely speaks until one begins to question it".Template:Sfn Likewise, he viewed historians as detectives who gathered evidence and testimony, as juges d'instruction (examining magistrates) "charged with a vast enquiry of the past".Template:Sfn Bloch was also an early theorist in the field of the preservation of collective memory.Template:Sfn

Areas of interestEdit

Template:Quote box Bloch was not only interested in periods or aspects of history but in the importance of history as a subject, regardless of the period, of intellectual exercise. Davies writes, "he was certainly not afraid of repeating himself; and, unlike most English historians, he felt it his duty to reflect on the aims and purposes of history".Template:Sfn Bloch considered it a mistake for the historian to confine himself overly rigidly to his own discipline. Much of his editorialising in Annales emphasised the importance of parallel evidence to be found in neighbouring fields of study, especially archaeology, ethnography, geography, literature, psychology, sociology, technology,Template:Sfn air photography, ecology, pollen analysis and statistics.Template:Sfn In Bloch's view, this allowed not just a broader field of study, but a far more comprehensive understanding of the past than would be possible from relying solely on historical sources.Template:Sfn Bloch's favourite example of how technology impacts society was the watermill. This can be summed up as illustrating how it was known of but little used in the classical period; it became an economic necessity in the early medieval period; and finally, in the later Middle Ages, it represented a scarce resource increasingly concentrated in the nobility's hands.Template:Sfn Template:Refn

Bloch also emphasised the importance of geography in the study of history, and particularly in the study of rural history.Template:Sfn He suggested that, fundamentally, they were the same subjects, although he criticised geographers for failing to take historical chronologyTemplate:Sfn or human agency into account. Using a farmer's field as an example, he described it as "fundamentally, a human work, built from generation to generation".Template:Sfn Bloch also condemned the view that rural life was immobile. He believed that the Gallic farmer of the Roman period was inherently different from his 18th-century descendants, cultivating different plants, in a different way.Template:Sfn He saw England and France's agricultural history as developing similarly, and, indeed, discovered an Enclosure Movement in France throughout the 15th, 16th, and 17th centuries on the basis that it had been occurring in England in similar circumstances.Template:Sfn Bloch also took a deep interest in the field of linguistics and their use of the comparative method. He believed that using the method in historical research could prevent the historian from ignoring the broader context in the course of his detailed local researches:Template:Sfn "a simple application of the comparative method exploded the ethnic theories of historical institutions, beloved of so many German historians".Template:Sfn

Block was multilingual, and impressed contemporaries with the breadth of his knowledge and erudition and his facility in both ancient and modern languages. His clear prose and his methodology of formulating historical issues in social terms left a strong impact on the discipline of history. Bloch dreamed of a borderless world, where the constraints of geography, time, and academic discipline could be dismantled and history could be addressed from a global perspective.Template:Sfn

Personal lifeEdit

File:Book signed by Marc Bloch and offered to Maurice Halbwachs.JPG

Bloch's signature on "La ministérialité en France et en Allemagne" in Revue historique de droit français et étranger, 1928; Bloch offered the book to Maurice Halbwachs and it is now held in the Human and Social Sciences Library Paris Descartes-CNRS

Bloch was not a tall man, being Template:Convert in height.Template:Sfn He was an elegant dresser. Eugen Weber has described Bloch's handwriting as "impossible".Template:Sfn He had expressive blue eyes, which could be "mischievous, inquisitive, ironic and sharp".Template:Sfn Febvre later said that when he first met Bloch in 1902, he found a slender young man with "a timid face".Template:Sfn Bloch was proud of his family's history of defending France: he later wrote, "My great-grandfather was a serving soldier in 1793; ... my father was one of the defenders of Strasbourg in 1870 ... I was brought up in the traditions of patriotism which found no more fervent champions than the Jews of the Alsatian exodus".Template:Sfn

Bloch was a committed supporter of the Third Republic and politically left-wing.Template:Sfn He was not a Marxist, although he was impressed by Karl Marx himself, whom he thought was a great historian if possibly "an unbearable man" personally.Template:Sfn He viewed contemporary politics as purely moral decisions to be made.Template:Sfn He did not, however, let it enter into his work; indeed, he questioned the very idea of a historian studying politics.Template:Sfn He believed that society should be governed by the young, and, although politically he was a moderate, he noted that revolutions generally promote the young over the old: "even the Nazis had done this, while the French had done the reverse, bringing to power a generation of the past".Template:Sfn According to Epstein, following the First World War, Bloch presented a "curious lack of empathy and comprehension for the horrors of modern warfare",Template:Sfn while John Lewis Gaddis has found Bloch's failure to condemn Stalinism in the 1930s "disturbing".Template:Sfn Gaddis suggests that Bloch had ample evidence of Stalin's crimes and yet sought to shroud them in utilitarian calculations about the price of what he called 'progress'".Template:Sfn

Although Bloch was very reservedTemplate:Sfn—and later acknowledged that he had generally been old-fashioned and "timid" with womenTemplate:Sfn—he was good friends with Lucien Febvre and Christian Pfister.Template:Sfn In July 1919 he married Simonne Vidal, a "cultivated and discreet, timid and energetic"Template:Sfn woman, at a Jewish wedding.Template:Sfn Her father was the Inspecteur-Général de Ponts et Chaussées, and a very prosperous and influential man. Undoubtedly, says Friedman, his wife's family wealth allowed Bloch to focus on his research without having to depend on the income he made from it.Template:Sfn Bloch was later to say he had found great happiness with her, and that he believed her to have also found it with him.Template:Sfn They had six children together,Template:Sfn four sons and two daughters.Template:Sfn The eldest two were a daughter Alice,Template:Sfn Template:Sfn and a son, Étienne.Template:Sfn As his father had done with him, Bloch took a great interest in his children's education, and regularly helped with their homework.Template:Sfn He could, though, be "caustically critical"Template:Sfn of his children, particularly Étienne. Bloch accused him in one of his wartime letters of having poor manners, being lazy and stubborn, and of being possessed occasionally by "evil demons".Template:Sfn Regarding the facts of life, Bloch told Etienne to attempt always to avoid what Bloch termed "contaminated females".Template:Sfn

Bloch was agnostic, if not atheist, in matters of religion.Template:Sfn His son Étienne later said of his father, "in his life as well as his writings not even the slightest trace of a supposed Jewish identity" can be found. "Marc Bloch was simply French".Template:Sfn Some of his pupils believed him to be an Orthodox Jew, but Loyn says this is incorrect. While Bloch's Jewish roots were important to him, this was the result of the political tumult of the Dreyfus years, said Loyn: that "it was only anti-semitism that made him want to affirm his Jewishness".Template:Sfn

Bloch's brother Louis became a doctor, and eventually the head of the diphtheria section of the Hôpital des Enfants-Malades. Louis died prematurely in 1922.Template:Sfn Their father died in March the following year.Template:Sfn Following these deaths, Bloch took on responsibility for his aging mother as well as his brother's widow and children.Template:Sfn Eugen Weber has suggested that Bloch was probably a monomaniac Template:Sfn who, in Bloch's own words, "abhorred falsehood".Template:Sfn He also abhorred, as a result of both the Franco-Prussian War and World War I,Template:Sfn German nationalism. This extended to that country's culture and scholarship, and is probably the reason he never debated with German historians.Template:Sfn Indeed, in Bloch's later career, he rarely mentioned even those German historians with whom he must, professionally, have felt an affinity, such as Karl Lamprecht. Lyon says Lamprecht had denounced what he saw as the German obsession with political history and had focused on art and comparative history, thus "infuriat[ing] the Rankianer".Template:Sfn Bloch once commented, on English historians, that "en Angleterre, rien qu'en Angleterre"Template:Sfn ("in England, only England"). He was not, though, particularly critical of English historiography, and respected the long tradition of rural history in that country as well as more materially the government funding that went into historical research there.Template:Sfn

LegacyEdit

File:Plaque Marc Bloch, 17 rue de Sèvres, Paris 6e.jpg

Plaque Marc Bloch, 17 rue de Sèvres, Paris 6e

It is possible, argues Weber, that had Bloch survived the war, he would have been a candidate for Minister of Education in a post-war government and would have reformed the education system he had condemned for losing France the war in 1940.Template:Sfn Instead, in 1948, his son Étienne offered the Archives Nationales his father's papers for their repository, but they rejected the offer. As a result, the material was placed in the vaults of the École Normale Supérieure, "where it lay untouched for decades".Template:Sfn

Intellectual historian Peter Burke named Bloch the leader of what he called the "French Historical Revolution",Template:Sfn and Bloch became an icon for the post-war generation of new historians.Template:Sfn Although he has been described as being, to some extent, the object of a cult in both England and FranceTemplate:Sfn—"one of the most influential historians of the twentieth century"Template:Sfn by Stirling, and "the greatest historian of modern times" by John H. Plumb Template:Sfn—this is a reputation mostly acquired postmortem.Template:Sfn Henry Loyn suggests it is also one which would have amused and amazed Bloch.Template:Sfn According to Stirling, this posed a particular problem within French historiography when Bloch effectively had martyrdom bestowed upon him after the war, leading to much of his work being overshadowed by the last months of his life.Template:Sfn This led to "indiscriminate heaps of praise under which he is now almost hopelessly buried".Template:Sfn This is partly at least the fault of historians themselves, who have not critically re-examined Bloch's work but rather treat him as a fixed and immutable aspect of the historiographical background.Template:Sfn

At the turn of the millennium "there is a woeful lack of critical engagement with Marc Bloch's writing in contemporary academic circles" according to Stirling.Template:Sfn His legacy has been further complicated by the fact that the second generation of Annalists led by Fernand Braudel has "co-opted his memory",Template:Sfn Template:Refn combining Bloch's academic work and Resistance involvement to create "a founding myth".Template:Sfn The aspects of his life which made Bloch easy to beatify have been summed up by Henry Loyn as "Frenchman and Jew, scholar and soldier, staff officer and Resistance worker ... articulate on the present as well as the past".Template:Sfn

File:Place Marc-Bloch, Paris 20.jpg

Place Marc Bloch, in the 20th arrondissement of Paris, is one of the streets to have been named after him.

The first critical biography of Bloch did not appear until Carole Fink's Marc Bloch: A Life in History was published in 1989.Template:Sfn This, wrote S. R. Epstein, was the "professional, extensively researched and documented" story of Bloch's life, and, he commented, probably had to "overcome a strong sense of protectiveness among the guardians of Bloch's and the AnnalesTemplate:' memory".Template:Sfn Since then, continuing scholarship—such as that by Stirling, who calls Bloch a visionary, although a "flawed" oneTemplate:Sfn—has been more critically objective of Bloch's recognisable weaknesses. For example, although he was a keen advocate for chronological precision and textual accuracy, his only major work in this area, a discussion of Osbert of Clare's Life of Edward the Confessor, was subsequently "seriously criticised"Template:Sfn by later experts in the field such as R. W. Southern and Frank Barlow;Template:Sfn Epstein later suggested Bloch was "a mediocre theoretician but an adept artisan of method".Template:Sfn Colleagues who worked with him occasionally complained that Bloch's manner could be "cold, distant, and both timid and hypocritical"Template:Sfn due to the strong views he had held on the failure of the French education system.Template:Sfn Bloch's reduction of the role of individuals, and their personal beliefs, in changing society or making history has been challenged.Template:Sfn Even Febvre, reviewing Feudal Society on its post-war publication, suggested that Bloch had unnecessarily ignored the individual's role in societal development.Template:Sfn

Bloch has also been accused of ignoring unanswered questions and presenting complete answers when they are perhaps not deserved,Template:Sfn and of sometimes ignoring internal inconsistencies.Template:Sfn Andrew Wallace-Hadrill has also criticised Bloch's division of the feudal period into two distinct times as artificial. He also says Bloch's theory on the transformation of blood ties into feudal bonds does not correspond with either chronological evidence or what is known of the nature of the early family unit.Template:Sfn Bloch seems to have occasionally ignored, whether accidentally or deliberately, important contemporaries in his field. Richard Lefebvre des Noëttes, for example, who founded the history of technology as a new discipline, built new harnesses from medieval illustrations, and drew histographical conclusions. Bloch, though, does not seem to have acknowledged the similarities between his and Lefebvre's approaches to physical research, even though he cited much earlier historians.Template:Sfn Davies argued that there was a sociological aspect to Bloch's work which often neutralised the precision of his historical writing;Template:Sfn as a result, he says, those of Bloch's works with a sociological conception, such as Feudal Society, have not always "stood the test of time".Template:Sfn

Comparative history, too, still proved controversial many years after Bloch's death,Template:Sfn and Bryce Lyon has posited that, had Bloch survived the war, it is very likely that his views on history—already changing in the early years of the second war, just as they had done in the aftermath of the first—would have re-adjusted themselves against the very school he had founded.Template:Sfn Stirling suggests what distinguished Bloch from his predecessors was that he effectively became a new kind of historian, who "strove primarily for transparency of methodology where his predecessors had striven for transparency of data"Template:Sfn while continuously critiquing himself at the same time.Template:Sfn Davies suggests his legacy lies not so much in the body of work he left behind him, which is not always as definitive as it has been made out to be, but the influence he had on "a whole generation of French historical scholarship".Template:Sfn Bloch's emphasis on how rural and village society has been neglected by historians in favour of the lords and manorial courts that ruled them influenced later historians such as R. H. Hilton in the study of the economics of peasant society.Template:Sfn Bloch's combination of economics, history, and sociology was "forty years before it became fashionable", argues Daniel Chirot, which he says could make Bloch a founding father of post-war sociology scholarship.Template:Sfn

The English-language journal Past & Present, published by Oxford University Press, was a direct successor to the Annales, suggests Loyn.Template:Sfn Michel Foucault said of the Annales School, "what Bloch, Febvre and Braudel have shown for history, we can show, I believe, for the history of ideas".Template:Sfn Bloch's influence spread beyond historiography after his death. In the 2007 French presidential election, Bloch was quoted many times. For example, candidates Nicolas Sarkozy and Marine Le Pen both cited Bloch's lines from Strange Defeat: "there are two categories of Frenchmen who will never really grasp the significance of French history: those who refuse to be thrilled by the Consecration of our Kings at Reims, and those who can read unmoved the account of the Festival of Federation".Template:Sfn Template:Refn In 1977, Bloch received a state reburial; streets schools and universities have been named after him,Template:Sfn and the centennial of Bloch's birth was celebrated at a conference held in Paris in June 1986. It was attended by academics of various disciplines, particularly historians and anthropologists.Template:Sfn

In November 2024, on the 80th anniversary of the Liberation of Strasbourg, the French President, Emmanuel Macron, announced Bloch would be inducted into the Panthéon.Template:Sfn

AwardsEdit

Knight of the Legion of Honour
Croix de Guerre 1914-1918, 4 mentions in despatches (2 bronze and 2 silver)
Croix de Guerre 1939-1945, 1 mention in despatches (1 silver-gilt)

WorksEdit

{{#invoke:Labelled list hatnote|labelledList|Main article|Main articles|Main page|Main pages}}

'A Contribution towards a Comparative History of European Societies', in Land and Work in Medieval Europe. London, 1967.
'Memoire collective', Revue de synthese historique 40 (1925): 73-83.
'Technical Change as a Problem of Collective Psychology', Journal of Normal and Pathological Psychology (1948): 104-15. Reprinted in Bloch, 1967, 124-35.
Apologie pour l'histoire. Paris, 1949. English trans., The Historian's Craft. Manchester, 1954.
L'Etrange defaite, Paris, 1946. English trans., Strange Defeat. London, 1949.
L'Ile de France Paris, 1913. English trans., The Ile de France. London, 1971.
La Societe feodale, 2 vols. Paris, 1939-40. English trans., Feudal Society, 2 vols. London, 1961.
Land and Work in Medieval Europe. London, 1967

NotesEdit

Template:Reflist

ReferencesEdit

Template:Reflist

BibliographyEdit

Template:Refbegin

|CitationClass=web }}

Template:Refend

External linksEdit

Template:Sister project Template:Sister project

Template:Base Léonore, Images of documents held by the Archives Nationales relating to Bloch's war service.
Centre Marc Bloch Template:In lang
Université Marc Bloch Template:In lang
www.marcbloch.fr Association Marc Bloch - website no longer active Template:In lang
History Heroes : Marc Bloch (Smithsonian Magazine) Template:In lang
Episode on Marc Bloch from the Wittenberg to Westphalia podcast (in English).
Description of Bloch's archives (in French)

Template:Annales School Template:Historians of Europe Template:Authority control