1923 Great Kantō earthquake
Template:Short description Template:Use dmy dates Template:Infobox earthquake
The 1923 Great Kantō earthquake (Template:Langx, or Template:Langx) was a major earthquake that struck the Kantō Plain on the main Japanese island of Honshu at 11:58:32 JST (02:58:32 UTC) on Saturday, 1 September 1923. The earthquake had a magnitude of 7.9 to 8.2 on the moment magnitude scale (Mw), with its focus deep beneath Izu Ōshima island in Sagami Bay.Template:Sfn The earthquake devastated the capital Tokyo, the port city of Yokohama, and surrounding prefectures of Kanagawa, Chiba, and Shizuoka, and caused widespread damage throughout the Kantō region.Template:Sfn
Fires, exacerbated by strong winds from a nearby typhoon, spread rapidly through the densely populated urban areas, accounting for the majority of the devastation and casualties.Template:Sfn The death toll is estimated to have been between 105,000 and 142,000 people, including tens of thousands who went missing and were presumed dead.Template:Sfn Over half of Tokyo and nearly all of Yokohama were destroyed, leaving approximately 2.5 million people homeless.Template:Sfn The disaster triggered widespread social unrest, including the Kantō Massacre, in which ethnic Koreans and others mistaken for them were murdered by vigilante groups based on false rumors.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn
In the aftermath, the Japanese government declared martial law and undertook extensive relief and restoration efforts.Template:Sfn The earthquake prompted ambitious plans for the reconstruction of Tokyo, aiming to create a modern, resilient imperial capital. However, these plans were often met with political contestation, financial constraints, and local resistance, leading to a reconstruction that, while significantly improving infrastructure, fell short of the grandest visions.Template:Sfn The disaster also fueled debates about national identity, modernity, and societal values, with many commentators interpreting the event as a divine punishment for perceived moral decline and advocating for spiritual and social regeneration.Template:Sfn
The Great Kantō earthquake remains a pivotal event in modern Japanese history, profoundly impacting urban planning, disaster preparedness, and social consciousness. 1 September is commemorated annually in Japan as Disaster Prevention Day.Template:Sfn
Earthquake and immediate impactEdit
The Kantō region of eastern Japan is prone to major earthquakes due to its location near complex tectonic plate boundaries. The 1923 earthquake occurred when the Philippine Sea Plate subducted beneath the Okhotsk Plate (sometimes considered part of the North American Plate) along the Sagami Trough in Sagami Bay.Template:Sfn The earthquake's epicenter was located approximately Template:Convert south-southwest of Tokyo.Template:Sfn The initial shock, occurring at 11:58:32 JST on 1 September 1923, consisted of two long periods of horizontal shaking punctuated by massive vertical thrusts.Template:Sfn This was followed by a second intense wave minutes later.Template:Sfn Over the next ten days, the region experienced 1,197 aftershocks strong enough to be felt by humans.Template:Sfn
The earthquake immediately toppled structures, crushed people, and caused widespread panic.Template:Sfn Survivor accounts describe an initial period of stunned silence followed by a frantic rush as people tried to reunite with family and salvage belongings.Template:Sfn Engineer Mononobe Nagao recalled the earth shaking "back and forth for what seemed like 15 seconds", followed by violent vertical convulsions that knocked people to the ground.Template:Sfn Writer Tanaka Kōtarō described the sound as akin to a giant "blackening whirlwind" churning up the earth from "deep underground".Template:Sfn
Fires and pandemoniumEdit
Within thirty minutes of the first tremor, more than 130 major fires broke out across Tokyo, particularly in the densely populated eastern and northeastern sections.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn These fires were fueled by overturned charcoal braziers used for midday meals, leaking gas from ruptured lines, and flammable debris from collapsed wooden buildings.Template:Sfn Strong winds, associated with a typhoon passing off the coast, fanned the flames, creating massive firestorms that swept through the city.Template:Sfn The air temperature in some areas reached Template:Convert.Template:Sfn
The combination of ongoing aftershocks and rapidly spreading fires led to pandemonium. Millions of residents attempted to flee, often carrying their possessions, which clogged the already damaged streets and bridges.Template:Sfn Kawatake Shigetoshi described being trapped in a "wave of people" in eastern Tokyo, unable to move as fires approached from multiple directions.Template:Sfn Many sought refuge in open spaces, such as parks and the grounds surrounding the Imperial Palace, but these areas quickly became overcrowded.Template:Sfn Waterways like the Sumida River also became congested with boats as people tried to escape by water, only to face sparks and burning debris falling from the sky.Template:Sfn The disaster rapidly overwhelmed Tokyo's infrastructure and its capacity for an orderly evacuation.Template:Sfn
Damage and devastationEdit
The Great Kantō earthquake was one of the most destructive natural disasters of the 20th century.Template:Sfn Roughly half of Tokyo and virtually all of Yokohama were transformed into "blackened, corpse-strewn wastelands".Template:Sfn The earthquake and subsequent fires destroyed an estimated 397,119 homes in Tokyo Prefecture alone, leaving about 1.38 million people homeless in Tokyo City.Template:Sfn Across the seven affected prefectures (Tokyo, Kanagawa, Chiba, Saitama, Shizuoka, Yamanashi, and Ibaraki), a total of 2.5 million people were displaced.Template:Sfn
The physical destruction was immense. In addition to buildings, the earthquake buckled roads, collapsed bridges (362 destroyed and 70 heavily damaged in Tokyo), twisted train tracks, snapped water and sewer pipes, and severed telegraph lines.Template:Sfn Tokyo's main aqueduct from Wadabori collapsed in two places and required extensive repairs.Template:Sfn The sea floor in Sagami Bay dropped by over Template:Convert at the epicenter, triggering tsunamis that inundated low-lying coastal communities.Template:Sfn
Fires were the primary cause of destruction.Template:Sfn In Tokyo, districts like Asakusa, Kanda, Nihonbashi, Kyōbashi, Honjo, and Fukagawa were largely incinerated.Template:Sfn The Honjo Clothing Depot, a large open area where over 30,000 people sought refuge, became a death trap when a massive firestorm (a {{#invoke:Lang|lang}} or whirlwind of fire) engulfed it, killing nearly everyone inside.Template:Sfn Survivor Koizumi Tomi described the site as "hell on earth", surrounded by "endless rows of bodies: red, inflamed bodies; black, swollen bodies; bodies partially buried under ash and smoldering remains".Template:Sfn
Governmental administration was crippled. The vast majority of police stations and municipal and ward offices crumbled or burned.Template:Sfn Out of Tokyo's 196 primary schools, 117 were destroyed, along with numerous higher girls' schools, trade schools, colleges, and universities.Template:Sfn Social welfare facilities, including public dining halls, cheap lodging homes, and crèches, were annihilated.Template:Sfn Over 160 public and private hospitals in Tokyo were destroyed.Template:Sfn
The economic impact was also severe. Roughly 7,000 factories were destroyed, including major spinning, dyeing, and tool manufacturing plants.Template:Sfn Financial institutions suffered heavily, with 121 of 138 bank head offices and 222 of 310 branch offices in Tokyo City consumed by fire or reduced to rubble.Template:Sfn Insurance policies offered little relief, as most contained clauses exempting companies from earthquake-related damage; eventually, the government intervened to facilitate partial payouts.Template:Sfn The disaster also led to significant unemployment. In September 1923, the unemployment rate in the wards of Tokyo reached 45% (59% for men, 28% for women).Template:Sfn By 15 November, across Tokyo Prefecture, 178,887 people were registered as unemployed, with the commerce and industry sectors most affected.Template:Sfn
CasualtiesEdit
The human toll of the Great Kantō earthquake was catastrophic. Estimates of the death toll vary, but a commonly cited figure is around 105,000 deaths, with some estimates reaching 142,000 when including those missing and presumed dead.Template:Sfn In Tokyo City alone, official figures listed 58,104 killed, 10,556 missing, 7,876 seriously injured, and 18,932 slightly injured.Template:Sfn The ward of Honjo suffered the highest number of fatalities, with 48,393 killed, largely due to the firestorm at the Honjo Clothing Depot.Template:Sfn
People died in numerous ways: crushed by collapsing buildings, trampled in panicked crowds, burned alive in the fires, or drowned in rivers and canals while attempting to escape the flames.Template:Sfn Some victims suffocated as fires consumed oxygen, while others were boiled alive in ponds offering no protection from the intense heat.Template:Sfn The smell of burning human flesh and decaying bodies permeated the air for weeks.Template:Sfn Disposing of the dead became a major public health concern, leading to mass cremations, particularly at the Honjo Clothing Depot.Template:Sfn
Social unrest and breakdown of orderEdit
In the immediate aftermath of the earthquake, law and order broke down in many parts of the affected region. This period was characterized by the spread of rumors, the formation of vigilante groups ({{#invoke:Lang|lang}}), and, most tragically, the massacre of ethnic Koreans and others mistaken for them.
Rumors and misinformationEdit
Widespread destruction of communication infrastructure contributed to an atmosphere of uncertainty and fear.Template:Sfn Rumors spread rapidly, often relayed by refugees fleeing the disaster zone.Template:Sfn Some stories suggested that Mount Fuji had erupted or that a large tsunami had washed away Yokohama.Template:Sfn The most damaging rumors, however, concerned alleged activities by Koreans.Template:Sfn False reports circulated that Koreans were poisoning wells, committing arson, looting, and organizing attacks on Japanese.Template:Sfn These rumors were given a degree of legitimacy when some government officials, including Gotō Fumio of the Home Ministry, broadcast messages warning of "organized groups of Korean extremists" attempting to "commit acts of sedition".Template:Sfn
Massacre of Koreans by vigilante groupsEdit
Fueled by these rumors and a climate of fear and xenophobia, Japanese vigilante groups, known as {{#invoke:Lang|lang}}, formed across the Kantō region.Template:Sfn By mid-September, an estimated 3,689 such groups were operating, ostensibly to prevent fires, stop looting, and maintain order.Template:Sfn However, many of these groups, often armed with makeshift weapons like clubs, swords, and bamboo spears, targeted Koreans and, in some cases, Chinese, Okinawans, and Japanese from certain regions who were mistaken for Koreans due to their accents.Template:Sfn
An estimated 6,000 Koreans were murdered in what became known as the Kantō Massacre.Template:SfnTemplate:Sfn Victims were often subjected to brutal violence, including beatings, stabbings, and lynchings, sometimes after being "tested" for their Korean identity (e.g., by being asked to pronounce Japanese words that were difficult for Koreans).Template:Sfn While some police and military personnel attempted to protect Koreans, others were complicit in the violence or turned a blind eye.Template:Sfn Despite the scale of the massacres, few perpetrators were prosecuted; of 125 vigilante group members tried, only 32 received formal sentences, and 91 received suspended sentences.Template:Sfn Contemporary commentators like Hoashi Ri'ichirō and Oku Hidesaburō condemned the massacres as "extremely disgusting and internationally shameful" and a "disgraceful act that exposed a moral flaw".Template:Sfn
Cabinet response and martial lawEdit
The earthquake struck at a time of political uncertainty in Japan. Prime Minister Katō Tomosaburō had died on 24 August, and Admiral Yamamoto Gonnohyōe, selected to form a new cabinet, had made little progress when the disaster occurred.Template:Sfn This elite-level political vacuum contributed to confusion over who had the authority to deploy police and military personnel.Template:Sfn General Ishimitsu Maomi, deputy commander of the Imperial Guard Forces, acted first, deploying troops to protect imperial locations.Template:Sfn Akaike Atsushi, inspector general of the Tokyo Metropolitan Police, faced an overwhelming task with outnumbered and unprepared forces.Template:Sfn The new cabinet was formally appointed on the afternoon of 2 September, sworn in on the lawn of the Akasaka Detached Palace amid falling ash, as other ministerial buildings were deemed unsafe.Template:Sfn
One of the first decisions of the new cabinet was to declare martial law over what remained of the capital on 2 September.Template:Sfn This ushered in the largest peacetime domestic mobilization and deployment of the army in Japan's pre–World War II history, with eventually over 52,000 troops deployed to Tokyo and Yokohama.Template:Sfn The martial law headquarters was granted extensive powers, including administering relief and public safety, prosecuting lawbreakers, prohibiting public gatherings, censoring information, stopping and searching individuals, and entering private homes.Template:Sfn Martial law remained in effect until 15 November.Template:Sfn
Initial military deployment was fraught with difficulties. Commanders arriving in Tokyo found a near total absence of reliable information and lines of communication were non-existent.Template:Sfn The military had to rely on aerial reconnaissance and around 2,000 army-trained carrier pigeons for communication.Template:Sfn The zone of martial law was progressively expanded to cover all of Tokyo and Kanagawa Prefectures by 3 September, and Chiba and Saitama Prefectures by 4 September.Template:Sfn To counter rumors and vigilante violence, particularly against Koreans, military authorities were empowered to arrest individuals, disband suspicious groups, and confiscate weapons.Template:Sfn From 4 September, military and police began to collect and transport Koreans to government-run detention centers for "protective custody"; by the end of September, 23,715 Koreans had been taken into these centers.Template:Sfn
Relief effortsEdit
The Yamamoto cabinet created the Emergency Earthquake Relief Bureau (Rinji shinsai kyūgo jimukyoku) to oversee all relief and recovery efforts.Template:Sfn
Medical aidEdit
Providing emergency medical assistance was an immediate priority, but initial efforts were largely unsuccessful.Template:Sfn Many organized rescue and first aid squads were unable to reach the worst-hit areas like Honjo, Asakusa, and Kanda until 4 or 5 September due to destroyed infrastructure and unofficial checkpoints by vigilante groups.Template:Sfn A dearth of medical supplies, due to the destruction of numerous hospitals and dispensaries, further hampered efforts.Template:Sfn The Relief Bureau concentrated its limited medical resources at large open areas like Hibiya Park and Ueno Park, where tens of thousands of refugees had congregated.Template:Sfn
Over the longer term, mobile clinics and dispensaries proved most effective. The Relief Bureau created 41 units, and other organizations like Tokyo Prefecture, the Japan Red Cross Society, and the Mitsubishi Corporation also operated mobile clinics. By 30 November, these public and private clinics had provided care to 447,111 sufferers. Temporary hospitals, some in tents donated by American and French governments, accommodated over 6,000 seriously wounded people.Template:Sfn
Food and waterEdit
Securing food and water was a critical challenge. Mayor Hidejirō Nagata learned on 2 September that the army's main supply depot in Fukagawa, holding 8,000 koku of rice (enough to feed over 500,000 people for six days), had been completely destroyed by fire.Template:Sfn The military managed to amass over 120,000 combat rations and 60,000 rations of rice from other stores. By 4 September, military units were distributing dried noodles. Eventually, 74,048 koku of rice were transported from military installations across Japan to distribution centers in Tokyo and Yokohama.Template:Sfn
The government also appealed to prefectural governors for rice donations, receiving pledges of 61,490 koku in the first week.Template:Sfn An "Emergency Requisition Ordinance" allowed the government to requisition foodstuffs and other materials.Template:Sfn Transporting these supplies was a major logistical challenge due to damaged rail lines and docks. Navy personnel spent a week repairing 86 piers at Shibaura and Ryōgoku, while army forces cleared railway lines and rebuilt track.Template:Sfn Conservative estimates suggest that 1.25 million people received rice distributions between 6 and 10 September.Template:Sfn
Water supply was an even more significant problem. Tokyo's main water plant was not heavily damaged, but pipes and aquifers were severed in over two hundred locations.Template:Sfn Warships tanked water from Yokosuka, Osaka, and Nagoya, and the army requisitioned water barrels to transport clean water. By the end of December, nearly 40 million gallons (151 million liters) of drinking water had been transported.Template:Sfn
Relocation and shelterEdit
Shelter options were bleak for Tokyo Prefecture's 1.55 million homeless. Nearly 800,000 people left Tokyo or Yokohama, first on foot and later via restricted rail service (from 11 September), to stay with relatives or friends elsewhere.Template:Sfn About 250,000 people dispersed to other parts of Japan, including 17,704 to Kobe, 7,600 to Hokkaidō, and some even to Japan's colonies like Taiwan and Karafuto.Template:Sfn
Those remaining in Tokyo flooded large open spaces such as Hibiya Park, Ueno Park, and the Imperial Palace grounds.Template:Sfn On 9 September, municipal authorities began constructing temporary barracks. The Meiji Shrine site housed nearly 6,000 refugees, Ueno Park over 9,500, and Hibiya Park 7,000.Template:Sfn Many of these open spaces became shantytowns. Barracks were often cramped, with an average of 0.6 tsubo (about Template:Convert) of floor space per person. Sanitation was a major problem, with makeshift latrines overflowing.Template:Sfn While a modest number of refugees left barrack housing by the end of 1923, many more returned to the disaster zone and erected private makeshift shacks. By October 1923, 539,450 people were living in 111,791 such temporary abodes.Template:Sfn
Interpretations and social impactEdit
Disaster as a national tragedyEdit
Government officials and media outlets made concerted efforts to construct the Great Kantō earthquake as an unprecedented national calamity, requiring a unified national response.Template:Sfn Newspapers, the chief medium for disseminating news, played a lead role. Major papers like the Tokyo Nichi Nichi Shinbun, Osaka Asahi Shinbun, and Osaka Mainichi Shinbun used emotive headlines, harrowing survivor accounts, vivid photographs, and even documentary motion pictures to convey the disaster's horror and scale to a national audience.Template:Sfn These portrayals often framed the disaster in terms of wartime analogies, emphasizing themes of sacrifice and national unity.Template:Sfn
The forty-ninth-day memorial service held on 19 October 1923, at the site of the Honjo Clothing Depot, attended by over 200,000 people and leading politicians, was a meticulously choreographed event. Speeches by figures like Gizō Kasuya and Shōzaburō Horie explicitly linked the victims' sacrifices to the future reconstruction of Tokyo and Japan, urging national unity and effort.Template:Sfn Visual culture, including lithographic prints and postcards, also played a significant role in disseminating the image of a devastated but resilient capital, and of a concerned government responding to the crisis.Template:Sfn Postcards depicting dead bodies, while sometimes classified as contraband, were widespread and brought the human cost of the disaster to a national audience in a stark manner.Template:Sfn
Divine punishment and moral admonishmentEdit
A widespread interpretation, embraced by numerous elites across various sectors of society, was that the earthquake was an act of divine punishment (tenken or tenbatsu) or heavenly warning.Template:Sfn This view was not confined to religious leaders but was articulated by bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and social commentators.Template:Sfn The disaster was seen as a response to Japan's perceived moral decline, materialism, luxury-mindedness, hedonism, and excessive individualism that had become prominent since World War I.Template:Sfn
The entertainment districts of Tokyo, such as Asakusa, and centers of consumer spending, like the Ginza, were often singled out as epicenters of this perceived degeneracy and thus seen as specifically targeted by the heavens.Template:Sfn The destruction of icons of modern consumerism, such as the Mitsukoshi Department Store and the twelve-story Ryōunkaku tower in Asakusa, was imbued with symbolic meaning.Template:Sfn This interpretation served as a cosmological bolster for critiques of contemporary society and legitimated calls for social, moral, and ideological reform.Template:Sfn The earthquake was thus framed as a moral wake-up call, placing Japan at a crossroads between decline and renovation.Template:Sfn
Spiritual renewal and fiscal retrenchmentEdit
The interpretation of the earthquake as divine admonishment fueled calls for national spiritual renewal (seishin fukkō) and economic moderation.Template:Sfn An Imperial Rescript Regarding the Invigoration of the National Spirit, issued on 10 November 1923, became a foundational document for this movement. It urged Japanese people to reject frivolousness, extravagance, and extreme tendencies, and to embrace simplicity, sincerity, fortitude, diligence, thrift, moderation, loyalty, and filial piety.Template:Sfn
Government campaigns, such as the 1924 Campaign for the Encouragement of Diligence and Thrift (Kinken shōrei undō), employed the memory of the earthquake to promote austerity and national savings.Template:Sfn Policies like the 1924 luxury tariff, which placed a 100 percent duty on a wide range of imported goods deemed luxuries, aimed to curb consumer spending and foster economic self-discipline.Template:Sfn While these measures had mixed results in altering consumer behavior in the long term, they reflected a broader elite concern with reorienting Japanese society towards more traditional and disciplined values.Template:Sfn The push for spiritual renewal also involved using schools, neighborhood associations, and new media like film and radio to inculcate desired moral values.Template:Sfn
ReconstructionEdit
Visions for a new capitalEdit
The devastation of Tokyo unleashed a wave of optimism among many bureaucrats, urban planners, and social reformers, who saw an unparalleled opportunity to rebuild the city as a modern, rational, and resilient metropolis.Template:Sfn Figures like Gotō Shinpei, Abe Isoo, and Fukuda Tokuzō argued that "old Tokyo" had been a breeding ground for social ills due to overcrowding, poor sanitation, poverty, and inadequate infrastructure.Template:Sfn The earthquake, they believed, created a chance to rectify these problems and construct a capital that would reflect new social values and assist the state in managing its subjects.Template:Sfn
Many visions for the new Tokyo were influenced by "authoritarian high modernism," emphasizing state-led planning, technical and scientific progress, and intervention in many aspects of human life, from public health and housing to urban layout and transportation.Template:Sfn Plans called for wider, paved streets, extensive green belts and parks, modern public housing, new sanitation systems, and improved transportation networks.Template:Sfn Some, like Gotō Shinpei, envisioned a grand imperial capital that would project Japan's emerging power and prestige on the international stage.Template:Sfn
Political contestation and planningEdit
Despite the initial optimism, reconstruction planning was fraught with political contestation. Gotō Shinpei, as Home Minister and head of the Reconstruction Institute (Teito fukkōin), championed ambitious and expensive plans, initially proposing a budget of nearly ¥4.5 billion for the complete purchase and replanning of burned-out areas of Tokyo.Template:Sfn This was met with immediate opposition from Finance Minister Inoue Junnosuke and other cabinet colleagues, who were concerned about the nation's financial stability and favored a more fiscally conservative approach.Template:Sfn
Debates raged over the scope of reconstruction, the extent of land readjustment, the design of new infrastructure, and, crucially, the budget.Template:Sfn The Imperial Capital Reconstruction Deliberative Council (Teito fukkō shingikai), an advisory body of elder statesmen and party leaders, further scaled back the government's already reduced proposals, leading to a final national reconstruction budget of ¥468 million approved by the Diet in December 1923, a far cry from Gotō's initial vision.Template:Sfn The political infighting exposed deep divisions within Japan's elite and the structural weaknesses of its quasi-democratic, bureaucratic-oligarchic political system.Template:Sfn
Land readjustmentEdit
A key component of the physical reconstruction was land readjustment (kukaku seiri). The Special Urban Planning Law of December 1923 empowered the government to rationalize irregular land plots, widen streets, and create public spaces by confiscating up to 10 percent of private land without monetary compensation.Template:Sfn Roughly Template:Convert of land in Tokyo were divided into 66 readjustment districts.Template:Sfn
While the process aimed to create a more rational and user-friendly urban environment, it was met with confusion, resistance, and numerous petitions from landowners and tenants.Template:Sfn Concerns involved the constitutionality of uncompensated land confiscation, the impact on businesses, the rights of tenants, and the adequacy of compensation for relocated structures.Template:Sfn Despite these local-level disputes, the program resulted in the rationalization of many neighborhoods, particularly in eastern Tokyo, and the creation of significant new public land for roads and other infrastructure.Template:Sfn Overall, about 15 percent of residential land in city-managed readjustment areas was converted to public use.Template:Sfn
Achievements and shortcomingsEdit
By the time reconstruction was officially celebrated in March 1930, Tokyo had undergone significant physical changes. The most notable successes were in transportation infrastructure. The total area of roads in Tokyo increased by 45 percent, and many were widened and paved, with modern sidewalks.Template:Sfn Key arterial roads like Shōwa-dōri were constructed, and new, modern bridges, such as the Eitai-bashi and Kiyosu-bashi spanning the Sumida River, became icons of the new city.Template:Sfn The river and canal system was also improved.Template:Sfn However, many of the more ambitious social and environmental goals were not fully realized. Spending on parks and green spaces was limited; by 1930, parks constituted only 3.7 percent of Tokyo's urban space, a marginal increase from the 1.7 percent in 1922.Template:Sfn Social welfare facilities, while improved, also received a small fraction of the reconstruction budget.Template:Sfn Many of the pre-earthquake urban vulnerabilities and social problems, including slum areas, persisted or re-emerged.Template:Sfn The final reconstruction expenditure by national and city governments totaled roughly ¥744 million.Template:Sfn
Earthquake Memorial HallEdit
The site of the Honjo Clothing Depot, where tens of thousands perished, became a focal point for mourning and remembrance.Template:Sfn Plans for a memorial were initiated soon after the disaster. In June 1924, the Taishō Earthquake Disaster Memorial Project Association was formed to oversee the project.Template:Sfn A national design competition for the memorial complex was launched in December 1924.Template:Sfn
The winning entry by engineer-architect Maeda Kenjirō, a Template:Convert tower, proved controversial due to its perceived resemblance to a Prussian triumphal tower and its perceived insensitivity to Buddhist sensibilities.Template:Sfn After sustained protest, particularly from Buddhist federations, the design was scrapped in December 1926.Template:Sfn Engineer Itō Chūta was then appointed to create a new, more "Japanese" design, heavily influenced by Buddhist architecture, featuring a pagoda that would house a charnel house.Template:Sfn The Earthquake Memorial Hall (later the Tokyo Metropolitan Memorial Hall) in Yokoamichō Park was completed on 1 September 1930.Template:Sfn
LegacyEdit
The Great Kantō earthquake left an indelible mark on Japan. 1 September was designated as Disaster Prevention Day (防災の日, Bōsai no hi) in 1960, an annual commemoration involving nationwide disaster drills and awareness campaigns.Template:Sfn The disaster highlighted urban vulnerabilities and influenced subsequent approaches to city planning and building codes, although the ideal of a truly disaster-proof city remained elusive.Template:Sfn The memory of the earthquake, particularly the firestorms and the Honjo Clothing Depot tragedy, continued to haunt Tokyoites, influencing their behavior even during the World War II bombings.Template:Sfn The events of 1923 also served as a catalyst for long-term government efforts to foster neighborhood associations (tonarigumi) and promote civil defense, trends that intensified in the 1930s and during the war.Template:Sfn The earthquake and its aftermath remain a subject of historical study and public memory, serving as a stark reminder of Japan's seismic activity and the complex interplay of disaster, society, and national identity.
See alsoEdit
- 1293 Kamakura earthquake
- 1703 Genroku earthquake
- 1906 San Francisco earthquake
- Amakasu Incident
- List of earthquakes in 1923
- List of earthquakes in Japan
- List of megathrust earthquakes
ReferencesEdit
Works citedEdit
Further readingEdit
- Aldrich, Daniel P. "Social, not physical, infrastructure: the critical role of civil society after the 1923 Tokyo earthquake." Disasters 36.3 (2012): 398–419.
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite journal
- Borland, Janet. "Voices of vulnerability and resilience: children and their recollections in post-earthquake Tokyo." Japanese Studies 36.3 (2016): 299–317.
- Clancey, Gregory. "The Changing Character of Disaster Victimhood: Evidence from Japan's 'Great Earthquakes'." Critical Asian Studies 48.3 (2016): 356–379.
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite news
- Hunter, Janet. "'Extreme confusion and disorder'? the Japanese economy in the Great Kantō earthquake of 1923." Journal of Asian Studies (2014): 753–773 online.
- Hunter, Janet, and Kota Ogasawara. "Price shocks in regional markets: Japan's Great Kantō Earthquake of 1923." Economic History Review 72.4 (2019): 1335–1362.
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite journal Pdf.
- Template:Cite book
- Template:Cite journal
- Template:Cite journal
- Weisenfeld, Gennifer. Imaging Disaster: Tokyo and the visual culture of Japan's Great Earthquake of 1923 (Univ of California Press, 2012).
External linksEdit
- The Great Kantō earthquake of 1923 – Great Kanto Earthquake.com
- Template:YouTube
- Great Kanto Earthquake 1923 – Photographs by August Kengelbacher
- Japan Earthquake 1923 – Pathé News
- The Great Kanto Earthquake of 1923 – Brown University Library Center for Digital Scholarship
- The Great Kanto Earthquake Massacre Template:Webarchive – OhmyNews
- Template:EQ-isc-link
- 1923 Great Kanto Earthquake – Fire Tornado – Video | Check123 – Video encyclopedia
- Photograph Albums of the Great Mino-Owari (1891) and Great Kanto (1923) Earthquakes at the Amherst College Archives & Special Collections
Template:Earthquakes in Japan Template:Earthquakes in the 1920s Template:Authority control